2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome based safety assessment for Bacillus coagulans strain LBSC (DSM 17654) for probiotic application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, we inferred that there was a low associated risk of resistance genes [tet (L) and cfr] transfer due to the absence of mobile elements within the gene vicinity. The WLYS23 strain is unlikely to mediate transferrable antibiotic resistance genes (Saroj and Gupta 2020). Therefore, genome-based safety assessment for the WLYS23 strain suggests that this strain is likely non-pathogenic to animals/fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, we inferred that there was a low associated risk of resistance genes [tet (L) and cfr] transfer due to the absence of mobile elements within the gene vicinity. The WLYS23 strain is unlikely to mediate transferrable antibiotic resistance genes (Saroj and Gupta 2020). Therefore, genome-based safety assessment for the WLYS23 strain suggests that this strain is likely non-pathogenic to animals/fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibiotic resistance genes and virulence genes were identified by local BLASTP with reference to the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD, , Version 1.1.3, accessed on 19 April 2021) and the virulence factor database (VFDB, , Version 1.0, accessed on 19 April 2021), respectively. We only considered BLAST results exhibiting more than 30% identity and 70% coverage and used a cut-off e-value of less than 0.01 [ 24 , 25 ]. IslandViewer ( , Version 4.0, accessed on 19 April 2021) was used for the identification and visualization of possible genomic islands in the DSM 2950 genome to assess its potential pathogenicity [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The susceptibility of the strains to 8 clinically important antibiotics [chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, ampicillin, kanamycin, streptomycin, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin: selected based on the EFSA guidelines for testing the antimicrobial susceptibility of the Bacillus species (EFSA 2012)] (Dina et al 2020). The strains (Kanjan and Sakpetch 2020) were tested for hemolytic activity by streaking on blood agar (5% v/v sheep blood).…”
Section: Safety Assessment Of the Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%