2009
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-99-12-1394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Diversity and Intra- and Interspecies Recombination Events in Grapevine fanleaf virus

Abstract: Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) was documented in self-rooted vines of four grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cultivars in eastern Washington. GFLV was found as mixed infection in cvs. Pinot Noir, Chardonnay, and Cabernet Franc and as single infections in cv. Merlot. Fanleaf disease symptoms were only observed in the first two cultivars. The spatial distribution of GFLV-infected grapevines was random, suggesting primary spread through planting virus-infected cuttings rather than infield transmission. RNA1 sequences of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Total RNA extracted from petiole samples collected from individual source grapevines, originally used for NGS, was used as template in one step-single tube RT-PCR for the detection of GFLV, Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV), HpSVd, GSYVd-1, CEVd, and Citrus exocortis Yucatan viroid (CEYVd) using species-specific primers (Table 2) and conditions described earlier [25], [26], [27]. For the detection of GRLaV, DNA was isolated [28] from leaf tissue collected from the same grapevines and used as a template in PCR assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total RNA extracted from petiole samples collected from individual source grapevines, originally used for NGS, was used as template in one step-single tube RT-PCR for the detection of GFLV, Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV), HpSVd, GSYVd-1, CEVd, and Citrus exocortis Yucatan viroid (CEYVd) using species-specific primers (Table 2) and conditions described earlier [25], [26], [27]. For the detection of GRLaV, DNA was isolated [28] from leaf tissue collected from the same grapevines and used as a template in PCR assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants for sampling were selected in such a way that individual grapevines exhibiting typical GLRD symptoms are adjacent to disease-free grapevines in a given row to minimize error in sampling and experimental results due to variations in growing conditions. Each pair of symptomatic and adjacent non-symptomatic grapevines was tested for different grapevine viruses by RT-PCR [75]. Mature leaves at the 4 th and 5 th node from the basal portion of primary canes showing typical symptoms of GLRD from virus-infected vines and comparable leaves from adjacent virus-free vines (Figure 2) were collected at the same time in mid September (representing post- véraison stage of berry development) to minimize variation due to developmental stage of leaves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lane M represents DNA molecular weight markers used to estimate the size of virus-specific DNA fragment amplified by RT-PCR. The 546 nucleotide DNA band amplified in test samples (indicated by arrow on the right) represents a portion of the 70-kDa heat-shock protein homolog of GLRaV-3 [32,75]. …”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satRNAs of GFLV-R2 and R6 were 1,140 nt in length and shared higher nucleotide identities to the ArMV-J86 and ArMV-NW large satRNAs than to the GFLV-F13 satRNA [11]. To date, the RNA1 and RNA2 of only four GFLV isolates (GFLV-F13, GFLV-WAPN173, GFLV-WAPN6132 and GFLV-SAPCS3) have been completely sequenced [14,15,16,17]. However, isolates GFLV-F13 and ArMV-NW are the only isolates that have their full genome, as well as their large satRNAs completely sequenced [10,13,14,15,18,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%