2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome engineering of Clostridium difficile using the CRISPR-Cas9 system

Abstract: The developed CRISPR-Cas9-based genome engineering tool will facilitate functional genomic studies in C. difficile as well as the elucidation of mechanisms related to host-bacteria interaction and pathogenesis of CDI. This will be highly beneficial for the development of innovative strategies for CDI diagnostics and therapies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the location of targeting has an effect on the efficiency of repression. Target sites that are farther away CRISPR-Cas9 system are higher than that of Cpf1, few genes were targeted and the same genes were not targeted between the studies (Table 1) (55,62). As for C. beijerinckii, the same mutation efficiencies were reported for two genes, spo0A and pta, using either Cas9 or Cpf1 as the endonuclease (61).…”
Section: Dcas9/crisprimentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the location of targeting has an effect on the efficiency of repression. Target sites that are farther away CRISPR-Cas9 system are higher than that of Cpf1, few genes were targeted and the same genes were not targeted between the studies (Table 1) (55,62). As for C. beijerinckii, the same mutation efficiencies were reported for two genes, spo0A and pta, using either Cas9 or Cpf1 as the endonuclease (61).…”
Section: Dcas9/crisprimentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In some organisms, including clostridia, the expression of the Cas9 endonuclease has a high cost on the bacterial cell in terms of toxicity (12,13,(47)(48)(49)(50). Despite this cost, CRISPR-Cas9 systems have been successfully applied in C. acetobutylicum (13,14,51), Clostridium autoethanogenum (52), Clostridium beijerinckii (12,13,50,53), C. cellulolyticum (48,54), C. difficile (15,55), Clostridium ljungdahlii (56), Clostridium pasteurianum (49,51), and Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum (57) ( Table 1) by tightly regulating the expression of the cas9 gene. Specifically, the implementation of inducible promoters (e.g., tetracycline-, xylose-, or lactose-inducible promoters) has helped to circumvent the issue of Cas9 toxicity (14,15,50,55,57).…”
Section: Wild-type Cas9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the endogenous HDR mechanism in most bacterial species follows a similar manner as that in E. coli . Thus, taking advantage of the intrinsic HDR machinery, a relatively simple design, carrying a CRISPR machinery (SpCas9 + sgRNA or FnCas12a + crRNA) and a homologous repair template (1–2 kB) either on the same plasmid or on separate plasmids, is able to manage the genome editing in many genera, such as Bacillus , Clostridium , Corynebacterium , Lactobacillus , Lactococcus , Methylococcus , Pseudomonas , Staphylococcus , Streptococcus , and Streptomyces (Table S1, Supporting Information). However, minor variance in the molecular detail of HDR can cause a large difference in recombination efficiency, since HDR is a sophisticated procedure, requiring the collaboration of multiple proteins .…”
Section: Repair Of Dna Double‐strand Breakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most surviving cells will have undergone a HR event thereby escaping CRISPR-Cas mediated killing. (Jiang et al 2013; Wang et al 2015, 2018). Genome editing approaches using HR and CRISPR-Cas9 have been used for numerous bacterial species, including Gram-positive lactic acid bacteria (Mougiakos et al 2016; Leenay et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%