“…Phylogenetic comparative analyses provide the most powerful approach for elucidating patterns of GS expansion and contraction in light of evolutionary relationships and for exploring the potential causes and consequences of such changes through correlational analyses of GS with environmental and biological variables. Such studies have been performed at multiple phylogenetic levels, from comparisons of diverse land plants (Beaulieu et al ., ,b; Knight & Beaulieu, ; Whitney et al ., ; Bainard et al ., ; Vesely et al ., ; Lomax et al ., ; Alonso et al ., ; Bromham et al ., ) to taxonomically more restricted analyses within plant families (Veleba et al ., ; Carta & Peruzzi, ; Ng et al ., ), and genera (Albach & Greilhuber, ; Grotkopp et al ., ; Jakob et al ., ; Gallagher et al ., ; Kang et al ., ; Meudt et al ., ; Baniaga et al ., ; Mandak et al ., ; Du et al ., ). Because of the highly dynamic nature of GS evolution and potential problems of representative sampling within groups for broader taxonomic comparisons, studies at lower taxonomic ranks – i.e.…”