2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Size Diversity in Lilium (Liliaceae) Is Correlated with Karyotype and Environmental Traits

Abstract: Genome size (GS) diversity is of fundamental biological importance. The occurrence of giant genomes in angiosperms is restricted to just a few lineages in the analyzed genome size of plant species so far. It is still an open question whether GS diversity is shaped by neutral or natural selection. The genus Lilium, with giant genomes, is phylogenetically and horticulturally important and is distributed throughout the northern hemisphere. GS diversity in Lilium and the underlying evolutionary mechanisms are poor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic comparative analyses provide the most powerful approach for elucidating patterns of GS expansion and contraction in light of evolutionary relationships and for exploring the potential causes and consequences of such changes through correlational analyses of GS with environmental and biological variables. Such studies have been performed at multiple phylogenetic levels, from comparisons of diverse land plants (Beaulieu et al ., ,b; Knight & Beaulieu, ; Whitney et al ., ; Bainard et al ., ; Vesely et al ., ; Lomax et al ., ; Alonso et al ., ; Bromham et al ., ) to taxonomically more restricted analyses within plant families (Veleba et al ., ; Carta & Peruzzi, ; Ng et al ., ), and genera (Albach & Greilhuber, ; Grotkopp et al ., ; Jakob et al ., ; Gallagher et al ., ; Kang et al ., ; Meudt et al ., ; Baniaga et al ., ; Mandak et al ., ; Du et al ., ). Because of the highly dynamic nature of GS evolution and potential problems of representative sampling within groups for broader taxonomic comparisons, studies at lower taxonomic ranks – i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Phylogenetic comparative analyses provide the most powerful approach for elucidating patterns of GS expansion and contraction in light of evolutionary relationships and for exploring the potential causes and consequences of such changes through correlational analyses of GS with environmental and biological variables. Such studies have been performed at multiple phylogenetic levels, from comparisons of diverse land plants (Beaulieu et al ., ,b; Knight & Beaulieu, ; Whitney et al ., ; Bainard et al ., ; Vesely et al ., ; Lomax et al ., ; Alonso et al ., ; Bromham et al ., ) to taxonomically more restricted analyses within plant families (Veleba et al ., ; Carta & Peruzzi, ; Ng et al ., ), and genera (Albach & Greilhuber, ; Grotkopp et al ., ; Jakob et al ., ; Gallagher et al ., ; Kang et al ., ; Meudt et al ., ; Baniaga et al ., ; Mandak et al ., ; Du et al ., ). Because of the highly dynamic nature of GS evolution and potential problems of representative sampling within groups for broader taxonomic comparisons, studies at lower taxonomic ranks – i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Relationships between GS and environmental and/or climatic variables have been explored in several plant groups with comparisons drawn at various taxonomic levels (Knight & Ackerly, ; Grotkopp et al ., ; Vesely et al ., ; Diez et al ., ; Kang et al ., ; Carta & Peruzzi, ; Du et al ., ; Li et al ., ; Bilinski et al ., ; Lyu et al ., ). While findings have not been universally consistent (Knight et al ., ), multiple studies have suggested that environmental conditions ultimately may place constraints on the evolution of GS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Knight and Ackerly (2002) examined variation in GS for over 400 plant species in California in relation to the mean July maximum temperature, January minimum temperature, and annual precipitation, and concluded that species with small GS predominate in all environments, while those with large genomes occur at intermediate July maximum temperatures, and decline in frequency at both extremes of the July temperature gradient, and with decreasing annual precipitation. Another example are species of Lilium, possessing giant genomes, in which GS correlates negatively with annual temperatures and precipitation (Du et al, 2017).…”
Section: Asparagusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome size (GS), being an indicator of evolutionary distance [1], is an important biodiversity trait [2] for molecular characterization of living organisms at a rapid pace. Many authors have proposed adaptive significance of GS variation [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Hence, GS is considered as proxy for understanding elementary biological processes at different spatial scales [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%