2011
DOI: 10.1038/nrg2958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping

Abstract: Comparisons of human genomes show that more base pairs are altered as a result of structural variation — including copy number variation — than as a result of point mutations. Here we review advances and challenges in the discovery and genotyping of structural variation. The recent application of massively parallel sequencing methods has complemented microarray-based methods and has led to an exponential increase in the discovery of smaller structural-variation events. Some global discovery biases remain, but … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
1,327
0
23

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,360 publications
(1,360 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(185 reference statements)
10
1,327
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…We posit that this reflects both a technological limitation and an ascertainment bias as a result of the mutation severity. Affordable whole-genome sequencing [29] has revealed a plethora of uncharacterized genetic variation below the lower limits of arrayCGH and SNP array platforms, which rapidly lose genome-wide sensitivity below 50 kbp for most commercial arrays [30]. The number of CNVs per individual increases linearly as sizes approach 100 kbp (closely related to the de novo rate and matching observations of selection against large CNVs), but then begins to increase exponentially for CNVs less than 10 kbp in size ( Figure 1B) [31].…”
Section: Size Spectrum Of Copy Number Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We posit that this reflects both a technological limitation and an ascertainment bias as a result of the mutation severity. Affordable whole-genome sequencing [29] has revealed a plethora of uncharacterized genetic variation below the lower limits of arrayCGH and SNP array platforms, which rapidly lose genome-wide sensitivity below 50 kbp for most commercial arrays [30]. The number of CNVs per individual increases linearly as sizes approach 100 kbp (closely related to the de novo rate and matching observations of selection against large CNVs), but then begins to increase exponentially for CNVs less than 10 kbp in size ( Figure 1B) [31].…”
Section: Size Spectrum Of Copy Number Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of copy number and structural variation is frequently an afterthought requiring specialized and computationally intensive methods [4, 29,30]. No method is comprehensive and each differs in its sensitivity as a function of size and class of CNVs.…”
Section: Size Spectrum Of Copy Number Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides different experimental techniques, there are many computational approaches for structural variation detection [24]. A straight forward idea to detect mutations would be to fully assemble the genome under consideration, the so-called donor genome , and to align it to a reference sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, there are three classes of methods to identify structural variations from those mappings. (See [24] or [29] for reviews.) (1) Significant fluctuations of the coverage of the reference by mappings can indicate copy number changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%