2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.14.22273877
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify drug targets for heart failure

Abstract: We conducted a large-scale meta-analysis of heart failure (HF) genome-wide association studies (GWAS) consisting of over 90,000 HF cases and more than 1 million control individuals of European ancestry to uncover novel genetic determinants for HF. Using the GWAS results and blood protein quantitative loci (pQTLs), we performed Mendelian randomization (MR) and colocalization analyses on human proteins to provide causal evidence for the role of druggable proteins in the genesis of HF. We identified 39 genome-wid… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis explored the causal roles of the human proteome and transcriptome on the largest HFrEF and HFpEF genetics dataset and identified 58 novel targets 8,9,[18][19][20][21][22][23] , for which we developed a therapeutic target profile encompassing efficacy, safety, and novelty of mechanism to help inform early drug discovery programs for HFrEF and HFpEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis explored the causal roles of the human proteome and transcriptome on the largest HFrEF and HFpEF genetics dataset and identified 58 novel targets 8,9,[18][19][20][21][22][23] , for which we developed a therapeutic target profile encompassing efficacy, safety, and novelty of mechanism to help inform early drug discovery programs for HFrEF and HFpEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To define novelty of hits, we compared our findings against all previously published GWAS and MR studies in HF and HF subtypes 8,9,[18][19][20][21][22][23] and categorized hits as one of three categories: novel, partially novel, and replication. Novel genes are defined as those that have not been previously reported and are not in LD (𝑟 + < 0.4) with a variant that has been published as a GWAS hit or as an instrument used for a MR hit; for further details, see section on "assessment of confounding by LD".…”
Section: Two-sample Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to conduct a proteome-wide scan for proteins suspected to play a potential causal role in the development of T2D, a T2D comorbidity, or a T2D complication. To identify weak instruments, we calculated the F-statistic 30 for each instrument (F-statistic = {3 2 ⁄Se 2 ). We performed MR on all proteins with 3 or more cis pQTLs using the MendelianRandomization 31 R package (version 0.7.0) and applying the simple and weighted median, IVW, and MR-Egger methods, finding the consensus effect by taking the median of the estimate, standard error, 95% confidence interval, and p-value across all methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open Targets have categorised target tractability based on eight buckets/groups for small molecules and nine buckets/groups for antibodies (see https://github.com/chembl/tractability_pipeline_v2). In order to aid interpretation, we categorised tractability into three mutually exclusive groups, in line with previous work 53 : Group 1. Strong druggability evidence: buckets 1, 2 & 3 for small molecules, antibodies, other modalities; Group 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%