2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2918-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association mapping of partial resistance to Phytophthora sojae in soybean plant introductions from the Republic of Korea

Abstract: BackgroundPhytophthora root and stem rot is one of the most yield-limiting diseases of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr], caused by the oomycete Phytophthora sojae. Partial resistance is controlled by several genes and, compared to single gene (Rps gene) resistance to P. sojae, places less selection pressure on P. sojae populations. Thus, partial resistance provides a more durable resistance against the pathogen. In previous work, plant introductions (PIs) originating from the Republic of Korea (S. Korea) have s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
40
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(138 reference statements)
4
40
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a critical finding, as breeding for resistance to traits controlled by minor QDRL is different from those of major gene or few major QDRL (Bernardo, 2008;St. The major QDRL for P. sojae identified on chromosome 13 with the resistance allele from HS6-3976 was identified previously from Conrad , PI 408105A (Nguyen et al, 2012), and in a genome-wide association study for quantitative resistance to P. sojae (Schneider et al, 2016). The major QDRL for P. sojae identified on chromosome 13 with the resistance allele from HS6-3976 was identified previously from Conrad , PI 408105A (Nguyen et al, 2012), and in a genome-wide association study for quantitative resistance to P. sojae (Schneider et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a critical finding, as breeding for resistance to traits controlled by minor QDRL is different from those of major gene or few major QDRL (Bernardo, 2008;St. The major QDRL for P. sojae identified on chromosome 13 with the resistance allele from HS6-3976 was identified previously from Conrad , PI 408105A (Nguyen et al, 2012), and in a genome-wide association study for quantitative resistance to P. sojae (Schneider et al, 2016). The major QDRL for P. sojae identified on chromosome 13 with the resistance allele from HS6-3976 was identified previously from Conrad , PI 408105A (Nguyen et al, 2012), and in a genome-wide association study for quantitative resistance to P. sojae (Schneider et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Resistance towards P. sojae has been identified in numerous soybean genotypes; >25 single Rps genes as well as numerous quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been mapped (Dorrance and Schmitthenner, 2000;Wang et al, 2010Wang et al, , 2012bLee et al, 2014;Matthiesen et al, 2016;Schneider et al, 2016;Dorrance, 2018). Although resistance towards Pythium has been identified in several soybean genotypes (Griffin, 1990;Bates et al, 2008;Ellis et al, 2013;Balk, 2014), it has only been mapped towards three species of Pythium to date (Rosso et al, 2008;Ellis et al, 2013;Stasko et al, 2016;Urrea et al, 2017;Lin et al, 2018;Klepadlo et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many QDRLs associated with partial resistance to P. sojae have been shown to have an effect in the greenhouse or laboratory (Lee et al, 2014;Schneider et al, 2016;Stasko et al, 2016), but few have been tested in the field (Li et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2012) where more environmental variation exists. In NIL set 4060, the resistant introgression R105B significantly increased yield under disease conditions compared to the susceptible introgression derived from OX20-8 (SOX).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 35 quantitative disease resistance loci (QDRLs) distributed across 17 chromosomes have been identified for partial resistance to P. sojae (Burnham et al, 2003;Weng et al, 2007;Han et al, 2008;Li et al, 2010;Tucker et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2011b;Lee et al, 2013aLee et al, , 2013bAbeysekara et al, 2016;Schneider et al, 2016;Stasko et al, 2016). However, the majority of these QDRLs explained <15% of the phenotypic variation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWAS is based on use of whole genome genotyping and a detailed phytopathological and morphological description of collections with a high level of genetic diversity (Klein, 2007). A survey of recent reports has shown successful use of GWAS for studying soybean resistance to fungal diseases (Bao et al, 2015;Iquira et al, 2015;Schneider et al, 2016;Qin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Gwas Of a Soybean Breeding Collection From South East And Somentioning
confidence: 99%