2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study and genomic selection for yield and related traits in soybean

Abstract: Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a crop of great interest worldwide. Exploring molecular approaches to increase yield genetic gain has been one of the main challenges for soybean breeders and geneticists. Agronomic traits such as maturity, plant height, and seed weight have been found to contribute to yield. In this study, a total of 250 soybean accessions were genotyped with 10,259 high-quality SNPs postulated from genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and evaluated for grain yield, maturity, plant height, and se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The GS was performed on amino acid concentration ( Qin et al, 2019 ), soybean chlorophyll content, soybean cyst nematode tolerance ( Ravelombola et al, 2019 ), yield, and yield-related traits, such as maturity, plant height, and 100-seed weight ( Ravelombola et al, 2021 ). These studies have shown the feasibility of GS for soybean yield and quality-related traits ( Matei et al, 2018 ; Stewart-Brown et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GS was performed on amino acid concentration ( Qin et al, 2019 ), soybean chlorophyll content, soybean cyst nematode tolerance ( Ravelombola et al, 2019 ), yield, and yield-related traits, such as maturity, plant height, and 100-seed weight ( Ravelombola et al, 2021 ). These studies have shown the feasibility of GS for soybean yield and quality-related traits ( Matei et al, 2018 ; Stewart-Brown et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the use of GWAS-derived SNPs for conducting GS significantly improved the accuracy of prediction, which was consistent with the results reported by Qin et al (2019) . The model selection criteria, SNP sets, and population training size were critical factors when conducting a GS, as reported in previous studies ( Ravelombola et al, 2019 , 2020 , 2021 ). Those studies had demonstrated that 1,000–2,000 genome-wide markers across all the lines/accessions were needed to reach maximum efficiency of genomic prediction in the populations, increasing marker density that would not improve prediction efficiency ( Poland et al, 2012 ; Bao et al, 2014 ; Zhang J. et al, 2016 ; Song et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide association studies have proved its efficiency in finding genomic regions linked with economically important agronomical features in several crops, including wheat [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ], eggplant [ 36 ], potato [ 43 ], and soybean [ 44 , 45 ]. There are important agro-morphological traits to be improved in eggplant, including the development of prickleless varieties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GS has been shown to reduce selection time in soybean breeding ( Matei et al, 2018 ) and the United States soybean germplasm collection has proven to be a valuable resource for creating GS models ( Jarquin et al, 2016 ). Promising results have displayed successful prediction of grain yield, protein and oil content, plant height, maturity, seed weight ( Ma et al, 2016 ; Duhnen et al, 2017 ; Stewart-Brown et al, 2019 ; Ravelombola et al, 2021 ) as well as soybean cyst nematode resistance ( Ravelombola et al, 2019 , 2020 ). However, only one study by Qin et al (2019) has evaluated GS for amino acid content in soybean seed, and it did not include Met concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%