2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study for crown rust (Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae) and powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. avenae) resistance in an oat (Avena sativa) collection of commercial varieties and landraces

Abstract: Diseases caused by crown rust (Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae) and powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. avenae) are among the most important constraints for the oat crop. Breeding for resistance is one of the most effective, economical, and environmentally friendly means to control these diseases. The purpose of this work was to identify elite alleles for rust and powdery mildew resistance in oat by association mapping to aid selection of resistant plants. To this aim, 177 oat accessions including white a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, six models, involving different combinations of K, Q, and PCA were used to analyze all of the traits examined this our study. As with early studies, the mixed PCA + K model was best in removing false-positive association signals (Table 2), indicating that population structure correction in a PCA model was more efficient than the STRUCTURE algorithm at eliminating false positives34. Hence, to reduce the number of false positives and negatives, only optimal models for each trait were considered when identifying association signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the current study, six models, involving different combinations of K, Q, and PCA were used to analyze all of the traits examined this our study. As with early studies, the mixed PCA + K model was best in removing false-positive association signals (Table 2), indicating that population structure correction in a PCA model was more efficient than the STRUCTURE algorithm at eliminating false positives34. Hence, to reduce the number of false positives and negatives, only optimal models for each trait were considered when identifying association signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Newly developed high‐throughput genetic marker assay systems, such as SNP, KASP and diversity arrays technology (DArT), are of benefit in oat breeding, with the construction of dense genetic maps enabling the discovery of additional resistance QTLs against crown rust in different oat crosses and RILs (Babiker et al ., ; Barbosa et al ., ; Chaffin et al ., ; Jackson et al ., ; Zhu and Kaeppler, ). In parallel, such systems are also used for genome‐wide association study (GWAS) as an alternative route to locate crown rust resistance QTLs (Klos et al ., ; Montilla‐Bascón et al ., ). Apart from their application in marker‐assisted selection, molecular markers are essential for map‐based cloning of resistance genes (Cabral et al ., ) as a basic step towards the determination of the mechanisms by which these genes exert their function.…”
Section: Genetic Resistance To Oat Crown Rustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, QTL for adult‐plant rust resistance have been mapped and can be placed on linkage groups Mrg02, Mrg06, Mrg08, Mrg12, Mrg17, and Mrg20 (Zhu and Kaeppler, 2003; Portyanko et al, 2005; Acevedo et al, 2010; Lin et al, 2014; Babiker et al, 2015). Association mapping using samples or subsamples of oat accessions numbering <200 lines have identified QTL on linkage groups Mrg01, Mrg03, Mrg08, Mrg20, Mrg23, and Mrg28 (Montilla‐Bascón et al, 2015; Winkler et al, 2016). Given the overlap in map locations and the variation in methods of assessing resistance, some QTL may be either the same as, or allelic to the Pc genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%