2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.147117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression profile ofNBS-LRRgene family in sweet orange (Citrussinensis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ka/Ks analysis of the NLR gene family in Lagneria siceraria ( Wang et al, 2022 ) revealed that among 14 duplicated gene pairs, two gene pairs were segmentally duplicated, and the remaining were tandemly duplicated indicating that the tandem duplication was more favorable and all the duplicated gene pairs were products of negative selection. Ka/Ks analysis of the NLR gene family in C. sinensis ( Yin et al, 2023 ) demonstrated that 16 duplicated gene pairs were tandemly duplicated and were a product of negative selection. The segmental and tandem duplications are equally contributing to the expansion of CNL gene family across the different plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ka/Ks analysis of the NLR gene family in Lagneria siceraria ( Wang et al, 2022 ) revealed that among 14 duplicated gene pairs, two gene pairs were segmentally duplicated, and the remaining were tandemly duplicated indicating that the tandem duplication was more favorable and all the duplicated gene pairs were products of negative selection. Ka/Ks analysis of the NLR gene family in C. sinensis ( Yin et al, 2023 ) demonstrated that 16 duplicated gene pairs were tandemly duplicated and were a product of negative selection. The segmental and tandem duplications are equally contributing to the expansion of CNL gene family across the different plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Liu et al, 2021 ) , 361 in Solanum tuberosum ( Jupe et al, 2012 ) , 78 in Solanum pimpinellifolium ( Wei et al, 2020 ) , 14 in Lagenaria siceraria, 146 in Triticum urartu ( Qian et al, 2021 ) , 166 in Discorea rotundata, 103 in Glycine max ( Afzal et al, 2022 ), 467 in Hordeum vulgare ( Liu et al, 2017 ), 54 in Broussonetia papyrifera (X. Zhang et al, 2023 ), 95 in Elaeis guineensis ( Rosli et al, 2018 ) , 10 in Citrus sinensis ( Yin et al, 2023 ), 47 in Alphonso , 27 in Hong Xiang Ya , and 36 in Tommy atkins ( ul Qamar et al, 2023 ). Machine learning approaches have also been applied in studies reported previously for the elucidation of candidate genes implicated in multi-stress responsiveness in Oryza sativa and Sorghum bicolor ( Woldesemayat et al, 2018 ; Ramkumar et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TIFY HMMER file was used as the reference sequence to filter out the E-value < 1 × 10 −5 from the results of protein sequence numbers [ 56 ], followed by the downloading of protein sequences of A. thaliana TIFY gene family members from the A. thaliana genome database TAIR ( https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp ). Then, the BLASTP program was used to compare the homology of the E. japonica genome with the TIFY protein sequences of A. thaliana as a reference to screen out the protein sequences with E-value > 1e −5 , and then the HUMMER search program was subsequently used to compare the protein sequences of the TIFY gene family members [ 57 ]. Finally, the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) tool of the NCBI database ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd ) and the online software Pfam ( http://pfam.xfam.org/ ) were used to confirm the presence of the TIFY structural domain [ 58 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalase (PF00199) and catalase-related (PF06628) Hidden Markov Model (HMM) files were obtained from the Pfam protein structural domain database (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 16 November 2021) [61]. The hmmsearch program of HMMER 3.0 software (http://www.eddylab.org/software/hmmer3/3.0/, accessed on 16 November 2021) [62] was used to scan the rubber tree protein data [63,64]. Protein sequences of three known CAT genes in A. thaliana (AtCAT1/AT1G20630, AtCAT2/AT4G35090, and AtCAT3/AT1G20620) were downloaded from the Arabidopsis genome database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 10 December 2021) [65] and used as reference sequences to blast the rubber tree protein data using the BLASTP method (version 2.2.6) [63,64].…”
Section: Identification Of Hbcat Genes In Rubber Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hmmsearch program of HMMER 3.0 software (http://www.eddylab.org/software/hmmer3/3.0/, accessed on 16 November 2021) [62] was used to scan the rubber tree protein data [63,64]. Protein sequences of three known CAT genes in A. thaliana (AtCAT1/AT1G20630, AtCAT2/AT4G35090, and AtCAT3/AT1G20620) were downloaded from the Arabidopsis genome database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 10 December 2021) [65] and used as reference sequences to blast the rubber tree protein data using the BLASTP method (version 2.2.6) [63,64]. We combined the results of the HMMER-and BlASTP-based searches and removed redundant sequences.…”
Section: Identification Of Hbcat Genes In Rubber Treementioning
confidence: 99%