2015
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-02-585042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic and epigenomic heterogeneity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract: Defining features of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are not only its immunophenotype of CD19+CD5+CD23+sIgdim expressing clonal mature B cells but also its highly variable clinical course. In recent years, advances in massively parallel sequencing technologies have led to rapid progress in our understanding of the CLL genome and epigenome. Overall, these studies have clearly demarcated not only the vast degree of genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity among individuals with CLL but also even within individual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
4
91
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…3,9,18,39 Using our targeted NGS approach on bulk leukemia cells, the likely subclonal distribution of the MH profile could only be inferred. Longitudinal genome-wide studies including multiple time points or single cell approaches are required to precisely reconstruct the tumor phylogeny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,9,18,39 Using our targeted NGS approach on bulk leukemia cells, the likely subclonal distribution of the MH profile could only be inferred. Longitudinal genome-wide studies including multiple time points or single cell approaches are required to precisely reconstruct the tumor phylogeny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 3 years, the CLL genome has been thoroughly characterized by next-generation sequencing (NGS). 3 Pioneer reports using this approach unraveled somatic mutations recurrently targeting multiple genes, among which TP53, SF3B1, NOTCH1, MYD88, and ATM were the most frequent. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Large retrospective studies in untreated patients from historical cohorts have recently shown the adverse prognostic impact of the TP53, NOTCH1, and SF3B1 mutations on time to treatment and overall survival (OS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 For these reasons, analysis of TP53 and IGHV mutational status has recently been incorporated into a new International Prognostic Index for treatment-naive CLL patients (the CLL-International Prognostic Index). 69 Finally, sequencing of .100 whole genomes 70,71 and .500 whole exomes [71][72][73][74] of CLL patients has now revealed recurrent somatic mutations, including those potentially associated with adverse outcome such as mutations in NOTCH1, SF3B1, and ATM (discussed in several excellent recent reviews: Rodríguez et al, 75 Kipps et al, 76 Guièze and Wu, 77 and Lazarian et al 78 ; Table 3). With the exception of TP53 alterations, however, detection of other mutations in CLL is not currently included in routine clinical practice in CLL as their prognostic relevance is not clear.…”
Section: Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In recent years, nextgeneration sequencing (NGS) studies have provided a complete profile of somatic mutations in CLL. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Few genes have mutations with mid/ low frequencies around 11% to 15%, whereas a larger group of genes are mutated at much lower frequencies (2%-5%), highlighting a striking interpatient heterogeneity. 10 The most commonly altered genes cluster in a limited number of pathways, including DNA damage response and cell cycle control, the nuclear factor-kB signaling pathway, messenger RNA processing, and NOTCH signaling among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%