2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic confirmation of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus transmission from deceased donor to liver transplant recipient

Abstract: In a liver transplant recipient with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) surgical site and bloodstream infection, a combination of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing, and whole genome sequencing identified that donor and recipient VRE isolates were highly similar when compared to time-matched hospital isolates. Comparison of de novo assembled isolate genomes was highly suggestive of transplant transmission rather than hospital-acquired transmission and also identified subtle inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to other patients, E. faecium was not recovered from stool obtained 9 and 5 days prior to the onset of bacteraemia but blood isolates clustered with stool and environmental isolates cultured subsequently (Additional file 3 : Figure S7). The van genes resided on a different plasmid to the other cases, the plasmid backbone contained a replicon recovered previously from an individual in New York, USA (plasmid accession ID CP018831) [ 36 ], our data showing 68% coverage of that plasmid. One blood isolate was vancomycin susceptible and lacked the whole plasmid, including the resistance gene (Additional file 3 : Figure S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast to other patients, E. faecium was not recovered from stool obtained 9 and 5 days prior to the onset of bacteraemia but blood isolates clustered with stool and environmental isolates cultured subsequently (Additional file 3 : Figure S7). The van genes resided on a different plasmid to the other cases, the plasmid backbone contained a replicon recovered previously from an individual in New York, USA (plasmid accession ID CP018831) [ 36 ], our data showing 68% coverage of that plasmid. One blood isolate was vancomycin susceptible and lacked the whole plasmid, including the resistance gene (Additional file 3 : Figure S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although we did not detect heteroresistance in the original A isolate, it is likely that low-level resistance was already present below the detectable limit. We consider horizontal gene transfer less plausible, especially considering that older ST736 isolates collected at Mount Sinai Hospital ( 37 ) all contained nearly identical 41-kb vanA resistance plasmids.…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…faecium isolates at our institution [27]. Since then, ST736 strains have been expanding to other hospitals in New York [28, 29], Washington [29, 30], Texas [15, 31], Maryland (https://pubmlst.org/efaecium/), Canada [32], countries in South America [15] and Caribbean [33], as well as Germany [34]. Moreover and the most worrisome, ST736 has been reported as the most common VREfm strains on hospital environmental surfaces and in laundry facility of some US teaching hospitals [31, 35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%