2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic insights into a contagious cancer in Tasmanian devils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern has been explained by the fixation of the same alleles across multiple MHC loci (drift across loci; Eimes et al 2011), or by the effects of PMBS itself when PMBS distorts allele frequency and the alleles are fixed/lost with higher frequency than alleles in neutral loci (Ejsmond & Radwan 2011). Drift was shown to be a predominant force in several studies that investigated the dynamics between genetic drift and PMBS in populations that experienced a recent bottleneck event (Miller & Lambert 2004b;Eimes et al 2011;Strand et al 2012;Grueber et al 2013Grueber et al , 2015Sutton et al 2015;Gonzalez-Quevedo et al 2015). On the other hand, several studies have shown that PMBS may counteract the effect of random genetic drift and maintain MHC diversity in spite of small population size (Aguilar et al 2004;Van Oosterhout et al 2006) or a recent bottleneck (Oliver & Piertney 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern has been explained by the fixation of the same alleles across multiple MHC loci (drift across loci; Eimes et al 2011), or by the effects of PMBS itself when PMBS distorts allele frequency and the alleles are fixed/lost with higher frequency than alleles in neutral loci (Ejsmond & Radwan 2011). Drift was shown to be a predominant force in several studies that investigated the dynamics between genetic drift and PMBS in populations that experienced a recent bottleneck event (Miller & Lambert 2004b;Eimes et al 2011;Strand et al 2012;Grueber et al 2013Grueber et al , 2015Sutton et al 2015;Gonzalez-Quevedo et al 2015). On the other hand, several studies have shown that PMBS may counteract the effect of random genetic drift and maintain MHC diversity in spite of small population size (Aguilar et al 2004;Van Oosterhout et al 2006) or a recent bottleneck (Oliver & Piertney 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devil facial tumour disease (DFTD) is an emergent transmissible lethal cancer exclusive to Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) and is threatening the species with extinction in the wild (Pye et al, 2016). Recently, genomic approaches have been brought to bear on DFTD (Deakin & Belov, 2012;Grueber et al, 2015;Pye et al, 2016). Devil facial tumour disease results in an extremely high rate of adult fatalities, with some wild populations already having been reduced by 95% (Deakin & Belov, 2012).…”
Section: Wildlife Disease Case Study 4: Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFTD cancer threatens the survival of the species and was one of the reasons to sequence the Tasmanian devil genome. 17,[21][22] The first Australian marsupial to have its genome sequenced was that of the tammar wallaby, but the assembly is currently highly fragmented 15 and has not allowed detailed TE analyses. Thus, the genome data of the Tasmanian devil offer a chance to analyze the TE composition and dynamics in an Australian marsupial genome and compare it to other mammalian species.…”
Section: Transposable Elements and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%