2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic prediction for commercial traits using univariate and multivariate approaches in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Abstract: Genomic heritabilities have previously been reported for the commercial traits in Nile tilapia [26,27], but these studies fail to report the predictive abilities of the genomic 3 and pedigree based models. In another study, increase in prediction accuracies was 3 indeed reported for Nile tilapia [28], based on univariate single-step GBLUP models.3 Thus, to the best of our knowledge this is the first report comparing prediction 3 accuracy using both univariate and multivariate approaches with GBLUP models and 3… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found moderate to high heritability values for ADG, BWH, WW, HW, HON, BLH, FW and FY, which is consistent with previous estimates for Nile tilapia calculated using pedigree and genomic methods [8,9,19,20]. The additive genetic variance and heritability estimated for BWH using genotypes imputed to high-density genotypes increased about 15% in comparison to the value previously estimated for the same population using a 50K SNP panel [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found moderate to high heritability values for ADG, BWH, WW, HW, HON, BLH, FW and FY, which is consistent with previous estimates for Nile tilapia calculated using pedigree and genomic methods [8,9,19,20]. The additive genetic variance and heritability estimated for BWH using genotypes imputed to high-density genotypes increased about 15% in comparison to the value previously estimated for the same population using a 50K SNP panel [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The availability of a chromosome-level reference genome assembly [14] and highthroughput whole-genome sequencing (WGS) methods [15,16], has allowed for the assessment of genetic variation of different Nile tilapia populations at a genome-wide level and the recent development of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels [17,18]. The availability of Nile tilapia SNP panels made it possible to use modern molecular breeding approaches; including mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection [19,20]. The GWAS approach evaluates the association between the genotype and the phenotype of interest, with both sources of information available for a large number of individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the platforms was designed based on the analysis of the GenoMar Supreme Tilapia (GST) strain (Joshi et al 2018), whereas the other platform derived from the evaluation of two strains belonging to Aquacorporación Internacional (Costa Rica) and a GIFT population from AquaAmerica (Brazil) (Yáñez et al 2020). These SNP arrays have been shown to be highly effective in the discovery populations, and have been used to generate high-density linkage maps and perform tests of genomic selection (Joshi et al 2020;Yoshida et al 2019a). However, while all of these commercial strains are related to the GIFT strain (which underpins a large proportion of global tilapia aquaculture), their utility and performance in other farmed tilapia strains, especially those inhabiting Asia and Africa, is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, univariate and multivariate genomic selection approaches have also been tested using dense SNP genotypes for growth-and disease resistancerelated traits (e.g. Streptococcus resistance), showing an increase in prediction accuracy, when compared with conventional pedigree-based genetic evaluation methods (Joshi et al, 2020c(Joshi et al, , 2019. These results indicate the benefits of genomic evaluations for the genetic improvement of these populations.…”
Section: Qtl Mapping Gwas and Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%