2006
DOI: 10.1038/nm1491
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics

Abstract: Using in vitro drug sensitivity data coupled with Affymetrix microarray data, we developed gene expression signatures that predict sensitivity to individual chemotherapeutic drugs. Each signature was validated with response data from an independent set of cell line studies. We further show that many of these signatures can accurately predict clinical response in individuals treated with these drugs. Notably, signatures developed to predict response to individual agents, when combined, could also predict respon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
387
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 549 publications
(400 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
387
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it suggests that molecular profiling using genome-wide assays can be a powerful and valid means of identifying biomarkers predictive of clinical response. This has been shown even for less selective agents, such as molecular profiles that predict for taxane activity in the treatment of breast cancer (31). Second, genome-wide profiles could point to additional genetic aberrations that further influence the efficacy of an agent in the absence of (or in conjunction with) primary markers; the fact that clinical responses may occur in only f25% of an already-enriched population (32) highlights the potential existence of additional predictive markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it suggests that molecular profiling using genome-wide assays can be a powerful and valid means of identifying biomarkers predictive of clinical response. This has been shown even for less selective agents, such as molecular profiles that predict for taxane activity in the treatment of breast cancer (31). Second, genome-wide profiles could point to additional genetic aberrations that further influence the efficacy of an agent in the absence of (or in conjunction with) primary markers; the fact that clinical responses may occur in only f25% of an already-enriched population (32) highlights the potential existence of additional predictive markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Statistical approaches-linear combinations of known input-output relations and desired phenotype are developed, neglecting the nonlinearity in biological networks. In these models, the system is treated as a black box, and it does not require a complete characterization of the biological networks 37,38 . (iii) Model-based combinations in which biological measurements are used to build explicit models of a target network using simulations 39,40 .…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 The currently most widely used such assay in the United States is Oncotype DX (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, USA), an RT-PCR-based assay, which analyzes 16 cancer-related and 5 reference genes to provide a Recurrence Score. The Recurrence Score is based on the assumption that patients will receive adjuvant hormonal manipulation and predicts a 10-year distant recurrence risk as a continuous variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%