1983
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(83)90210-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxic activity of pulp mill effluent in Salmonella and Saccharomyces cerevisiae assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metabolism of active mutagenic substances present in SWW into less genotoxic compounds by the S9 fraction might be the main cause of this lowering effect. Similar results were obtained by several authors in a genotoxicity assessment of pulp mill effluents (Nestmann et al , ; Kamra et al , ; Perez‐Alzola and Santos, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The metabolism of active mutagenic substances present in SWW into less genotoxic compounds by the S9 fraction might be the main cause of this lowering effect. Similar results were obtained by several authors in a genotoxicity assessment of pulp mill effluents (Nestmann et al , ; Kamra et al , ; Perez‐Alzola and Santos, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, according to the present results AA is a weak ENA inducer in A. anguilla L. However, early increases in EMN and ENA frequency at 2 and 6 h exposure, respectively, to 0.9 and 0.0125 mM AA in juvenile sea bass (Gravato and Santos, 2002a, b) suggest that this juvenile fish species is highly sensitive compared with adult eels. Other research work concerning the Ames test demonstrated that the PME chlorination stage induces mutations in Salmonella typhimurium (Kamra et al, 1983) and its mutagenicity decreased with decreasing amounts of free chlorine contained in those liquors resulting from the bleaching process (Nylund et al, 1994). Previous studies with eels exposed to BaP demonstrated that 2.7 mM had a prolonged ENA effect from 72 to 216 h exposure (Maria et al, 2002), whereas BNF had no ENA effect on eels from 2 to 72 h exposure (Teles et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This fact was also observed by other authors (Saxena and Schwartz, 1979;Flanagan and Allen, 1981;Grimm-Kibalo et al, 1981;Vargas et al, 1988). This subject should be elucidated in further studies to understand the nature of this inactivation, if enzymatic or not (Douglas et al, 1980;Kamra et al, 1983) to have a better characterization of the mutagens detected in this kind of water. Figure 3 represents the distribution of mutagenic samples, bimonthly.…”
Section: Metabolic Activation Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%