2006
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.2006.10797921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxic Effects of Avenoxan onAllium cepa L.andAllium sativum L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand the inhibition of certain cell cycle specific proteins remains as a possible herbicide target site. Thus, inhibition of enzyme DNA polymerase which is necessary for the synthesis of DNA precursors as well as other enzymes more directly involved with spindle production, assembly or orientation could explain the reported antimitotic effect (Tartar et al, 2006). Therefore, these processes explained the inhibitory effect of amitraz pesticides induced in Allium plant-system in the present study.…”
Section: Mean Root Length Growth Inhibition and Mitotic Indices Of Asupporting
confidence: 50%
“…On the other hand the inhibition of certain cell cycle specific proteins remains as a possible herbicide target site. Thus, inhibition of enzyme DNA polymerase which is necessary for the synthesis of DNA precursors as well as other enzymes more directly involved with spindle production, assembly or orientation could explain the reported antimitotic effect (Tartar et al, 2006). Therefore, these processes explained the inhibitory effect of amitraz pesticides induced in Allium plant-system in the present study.…”
Section: Mean Root Length Growth Inhibition and Mitotic Indices Of Asupporting
confidence: 50%
“…These results indicate the potential of these agents to induce mitotic irregularities, as observed by few earlier studies (Abdelsalam et al 1997;Siddiqui et al 2009). The chromosomal aberration induced by these herbicides could be due to their inhibitory action on spindle proteins and also their ability to induce sister chromatid exchange (Barbara et al 1991;Grossmann et al 2001;Claudio et al 1992;Tartar et al 2006;Gichner et al 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 48 h treatment period, 0.67 and 2.68 mg/L concentrations induced lagging chromosomes with the frequency of 0.37 and 0.15, respectively. Lagging chromosomes arise mainly due to abnormal spindle formation and as a result, spindle fibre failed to carry respective chromosomes to the polar regions with appearance of lagging chromosomes (Tarar and Dyansagar 1980;Tartar et al 2006;Pulate and Tarar 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%