2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8810105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxic Effects of Etoposide, Bleomycin, and Ethyl Methanesulfonate on Cultured CHO Cells: Analysis by GC-MS/MS and Comet Assay

Abstract: To evaluate methods for analysis of genotoxic effects on mammalian cell lines, we tested the effect of three common genotoxic agents on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells by single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Suspension-grown CHO cells were separately incubated with etoposide, bleomycin, and ethyl methanesulfonate and analyzed by an alkaline comet assay and GC-MS/MS. Although DNA strand breaks were detected by the comet assay after treatment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of suspended cells could alleviate the problem of insufficient cells for comet analysis at high treatment levels. FreeStyle cell preparations would also be well suited for additional characterization methods that require isolation of DNA, such as mass spectrometry [ 43 ]. For the preparation of a reference material, the treated cells would also need to be quickly frozen and stored at −150°C to prevent DNA repair before they are used for subsequent certification by the comet and viability assay and any additional measurements [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of suspended cells could alleviate the problem of insufficient cells for comet analysis at high treatment levels. FreeStyle cell preparations would also be well suited for additional characterization methods that require isolation of DNA, such as mass spectrometry [ 43 ]. For the preparation of a reference material, the treated cells would also need to be quickly frozen and stored at −150°C to prevent DNA repair before they are used for subsequent certification by the comet and viability assay and any additional measurements [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FreeStyle cell preparations would also be well suited for additional characterization methods that require isolation of DNA, such as mass spectrometry [ 43 ]. For the preparation of a reference material, the treated cells would also need to be quickly frozen and stored at −150°C to prevent DNA repair before they are used for subsequent certification by the comet and viability assay and any additional measurements [ 43 ]. Certification by multiple methods of comet analysis such as %tail DNA and OTM would be useful.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of this study was to examine the effect of these compounds on normal cells as they have the potential for systemic treatment of various, non-cancerous diseases. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were chosen, as they represent a widely used model system for the comet assay [21][22][23], which are easy to handle and highly tolerant to variations in pH, oxygen levels and temperature. Since there are no data about the potential cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of these novel compounds, here we investigated their effects on cell viability and DNA stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been reported in the literature for the estimation of ETO, MOX and NAL in their pharmaceutical dosage form and/or biological fluids; for ETO: spectrophotometric [8], spectrofluorimetric (SF) [9], electrochemical [10,11], high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) [12], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [13][14][15][16][17], gas chromatography (GC) [18] and capillary electrophoresis (CP) [19]; for MOX: spectrophotometric [20,21], SF [22], electrochemical [23], HPTLC [24], HPLC [25][26][27] and CP [28] and for NAL spectrophotometric [29][30][31], SF [31,32], flow injection analysis [33,34], HPLC [35][36][37] and GC [38]. These presented methods did not guide the monitoring of these three drugs in the biological matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%