2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials: Methods, preparation and characterization of test material, potential artifacts and limitations—Many questions, some answers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
202
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
9
202
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Large differences in reported toxicity of CNPs in the literature are likely a consequence of investigators actually testing different materials, starting materials containing varying amounts of contamination, and variable aggregation of the NPs occurring in the test solution. Carefully characterizing starting materials will enhance comparability of results among laboratories, facilitate interpretations of ecotoxicity results, and help the field to develop standardized ecotoxicity tests for CNPs [37][38][39][40] Residual chemical impurities (organic chemicals or metals) from the synthesis process or from subsequent chemical modifications of CNPs are likely to be present especially for CNTs. Carbon nanotubes are often synthesized by chemical vapor deposition, a process in which nanotubes are formed by passing a hydrocarbon gas over a metal catalyst at an elevated temperature [41,42].…”
Section: Steps In Conducting Ecotoxicity Tests With Cnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large differences in reported toxicity of CNPs in the literature are likely a consequence of investigators actually testing different materials, starting materials containing varying amounts of contamination, and variable aggregation of the NPs occurring in the test solution. Carefully characterizing starting materials will enhance comparability of results among laboratories, facilitate interpretations of ecotoxicity results, and help the field to develop standardized ecotoxicity tests for CNPs [37][38][39][40] Residual chemical impurities (organic chemicals or metals) from the synthesis process or from subsequent chemical modifications of CNPs are likely to be present especially for CNTs. Carbon nanotubes are often synthesized by chemical vapor deposition, a process in which nanotubes are formed by passing a hydrocarbon gas over a metal catalyst at an elevated temperature [41,42].…”
Section: Steps In Conducting Ecotoxicity Tests With Cnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more in vivo studies are required to fully understand the mechanism of TiO 2 nanoparticles toxicity. Likewise, more caution should be considered for toxicity assessment of nanoparticles because of the limitations and potential artifacts of the results (Doak, et al, 2012, Landsiedel et al, 2009. This study provides a better insight into the potential toxicity of nanoparticles with respect to their physiochemical characteristics.…”
Section: Most Of the Toxicological Results On Nps Have Been Generatedmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…DNA damage assessed by classic assays is positive in most studies conducted to date. 417 Inefficient DNA repair may be the primary risk for nanoparticle-induced hereditary and carcinogenic toxicity. DNA damage is the consequence of nanoparticles' 'double hits' on DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%