2019
DOI: 10.1101/570614
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype-free demultiplexing of pooled single-cell RNA-seq

Abstract: A variety of experimental and computational methods have been developed to demultiplex samples from different individuals mixed in a single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) experiment. However, these methods all require extra information is either added to samples (such as sample barcode) or measured from samples prior to mixing (such as genome-wide genotypes). We introduce an alternative approach, in which genetic differences between mixed samples are inferred directly from scRNAseq data without extra informat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demultiplex the data, as well as to identify droplets containing ambient mRNA (empty droplets) or two cells ('doublets'), we developed a computational method based on SNP-fingerprinting, which classifies single cells with negligible error rates, even for cells with low sequencing depth. During the course of this project, several other methods for SNP-based demultiplexing have been published 20,47,48 . In particular, Demuxlet applies a similar approach, using pre-computed reference SNP profiles for the samples being pooled to identify single cells and detect doublets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demultiplex the data, as well as to identify droplets containing ambient mRNA (empty droplets) or two cells ('doublets'), we developed a computational method based on SNP-fingerprinting, which classifies single cells with negligible error rates, even for cells with low sequencing depth. During the course of this project, several other methods for SNP-based demultiplexing have been published 20,47,48 . In particular, Demuxlet applies a similar approach, using pre-computed reference SNP profiles for the samples being pooled to identify single cells and detect doublets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d Measures multiplet rate but does not facilitate detection of multiplet cell states in typical experimental samples from a single organism Natural genetic variation (Kang et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2019) By mixing together cells from comparable samples from multiple genotyped individuals, genetic variants in transcripts can be used to assign each cell barcode to one individual, or in the case of multiplets, to multiple individuals. Only inter-individual multiplets can be identified, so the fraction of detectable multiplets increases with the number of individuals.…”
Section: Methods Name and References Approach Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sample points can be 1) grouped by four Zeitgeber (ZT) times to analyse the transcriptional correlates of circadian rhythms; 2) grouped by "sleep" and "wakefulness" states according to the animal's vigilance status at the time of sample collection to examine "sleep/wakefulness" correlates; and 3) selected and ordered by the fly's level of sleep drive to determine molecular changes associated with the sleep homeostat. To minimize technical batch effects that may mask true biological responses, we applied demultiplexing based on natural variation between wild-type genotypes 13,14 . Specifically, instead of associating each batch to a different sleep or wakefulness state, we associated a different Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) 15 line to each behavioural condition (Fig.…”
Section: Single-cell Transcriptomes Of Fly Brain Cells At Different S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DGRP lines can be distinguished from one another by their unique SNPs. Their natural genetic variation from each other allows us to determine the condition for each cell from the sequenced data [13][14][15] . This strategy has the added advantage of removing around 90% of droplets that enclose two cells instead of one from the dataset.…”
Section: Multiplexing Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%