Major efforts using loss-of-function genetic screens to systematically identify genes essential to the proliferation and survival of cancer cells have been reported [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . Genes identified by these approaches may represent specific genetic vulnerabilities of cancer cells, suggesting treatment strategies and directing the development of novel therapeutics. The CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system has proven to be a powerful tool to interrogate gene essentiality in cancer cell lines. Its relative ease of application, high rates of target validation, and increased specificity compared to RNA interference technology make it an ideal instrument for use in high-throughput functional genomic screening 10 .However, we and others have recently observed that measurements of genetic dependency in genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function screens are influenced by the genomic copy number (CN) of the region targeted by the sgRNA-Cas9 complex [1][2][3][4] . Targeting Cas9 to DNA sequences within regions of high CN gain creates multiple DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), inducing a gene-independent DNA damage response and a G2 cell-cycle arrest phenotype 2 .This systematic, sequence-independent effect due to DNA cleavage (copy-number effect)confounds the measurement of the consequences of gene deletion on cell viability (geneknockout effect) and is detectable even among low-level CN amplifications and deletions. In particular, this phenomenon hinders interpretation of CRISPR-Cas9 experiments in cancer cell

Cultured cell lines are the workhorse of cancer research, but it is unclear to what extent they recapitulate the cellular heterogeneity observed among malignant cells in tumors. To address this, we used multiplexed single cell RNA-seq to profile ~200 cancer cell lines from 22 cancer types. We uncovered 12 expression programs that are recurrently heterogeneous within many cancer cell lines. These programs are associated with diverse biological processes including cell cycle, senescence, stress and interferon responses, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and protein maturation and degradation. Notably, most of these recurrent programs of heterogeneity recapitulate those recently observed within human tumors. The similarity to tumors allowed us to prioritize specific cell lines as model systems of cellular heterogeneity. We used two such models

U. (2021).Aneuploidy renders cancer cells vulnerable to mitotic checkpoint inhibition. Nature, 590(7846).

Assays to study cancer cell responses to pharmacologic or genetic perturbations are typically restricted to using simple phenotypic readouts such as proliferation rate. Information-rich assays, such as gene-expression profiling, have generally not permitted efficient profiling of a given perturbation across multiple cellular contexts. Here, we develop MIX-Seq, a method for multiplexed transcriptional profiling of post-perturbation responses across a mixture of samples with single-cell resolution, using SNP-based computational demultiplexing of singlecell RNA-sequencing data. We show that MIX-Seq can be used to profile responses to chemical or genetic perturbations across pools of 100 or more cancer cell lines. We combine it with Cell Hashing to further multiplex additional experimental conditions, such as posttreatment time points or drug doses. Analyzing the high-content readout of scRNA-seq reveals both shared and context-specific transcriptional response components that can identify drug mechanism of action and enable prediction of long-term cell viability from shortterm transcriptional responses to treatment.

Cell lines are key tools for preclinical cancer research, but it remains unclear how well they represent patient tumor samples. Direct comparisons of tumor and cell line transcriptional profiles are complicated by several factors, including the variable presence of normal cells in tumor samples. We thus develop an unsupervised alignment method (Celligner) and apply it to integrate several large-scale cell line and tumor RNA-Seq datasets. Although our method aligns the majority of cell lines with tumor samples of the same cancer type, it also reveals large differences in tumor similarity across cell lines. Using this approach, we identify several hundred cell lines from diverse lineages that present a more mesenchymal and undifferentiated transcriptional state and that exhibit distinct chemical and genetic dependencies. Celligner could be used to guide the selection of cell lines that more closely resemble patient tumors and improve the clinical translation of insights gained from cell lines.