2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17440-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplexed single-cell transcriptional response profiling to define cancer vulnerabilities and therapeutic mechanism of action

Abstract: Assays to study cancer cell responses to pharmacologic or genetic perturbations are typically restricted to using simple phenotypic readouts such as proliferation rate. Information-rich assays, such as gene-expression profiling, have generally not permitted efficient profiling of a given perturbation across multiple cellular contexts. Here, we develop MIX-Seq, a method for multiplexed transcriptional profiling of post-perturbation responses across a mixture of samples with single-cell resolution, using SNP-bas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b-d), were concordant between the two separate multiplexed experiments and robust to different transcriptome annotations ( Supplementary Fig. 5, 11,13). For some of them, cell type identity could be assigned on the basis of published information on gene expression in Clytia and/or of homologous genes in other animals, while for the others we performed in situ hybridization for selected marker genes ( Fig.…”
Section: A Clytia Cell Atlassupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2b-d), were concordant between the two separate multiplexed experiments and robust to different transcriptome annotations ( Supplementary Fig. 5, 11,13). For some of them, cell type identity could be assigned on the basis of published information on gene expression in Clytia and/or of homologous genes in other animals, while for the others we performed in situ hybridization for selected marker genes ( Fig.…”
Section: A Clytia Cell Atlassupporting
confidence: 59%
“…However, scRNA-seq studies involving multiple samples can be costly, and may be confounded by batch effects resulting from multiple distinct library preparations 12,13 . Recent developments in scRNA-seq multiplexing technology expand the number of samples, individuals, or perturbations that can be incorporated within runs, facilitating well-controlled scRNA-seq experiments 11,[14][15][16][17][18] . These advances have created an opportunity to explore systems biology of whole organisms at single-cell resolution, merging the concepts of cell atlas surveys with multiplexed single-cell experimentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, a WT endogenous allele is required for distinguishing dominant negative from LOF effects). The pooled nature of Perturb-Seq should allow us to readily extend this work to many cell lines, including existing pools of cell lines such as PRISM (Kinker et al, 2019; McFarland et al, 2020). Second, we used exogenously expressed cDNA constructs, where viral packaging limits the interrogation of longer (>3.5kb) genes, and where some variants may be expressed at non-physiologic levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ScRNA-seq data from epithelial cancer cell lines in control and drug-treated culture conditions were acquired from McFarland et al (McFarland et al, 2020) and Cook & Vanderhyden (Cook and Vanderhyden, 2020). Initial data processing was performed identically to tumour samples and cell lines with fewer than 100 measured cells were removed.…”
Section: Assessing Effects Of Small Molecule Inhibitors On Empmentioning
confidence: 99%