Abstract.-Genetically divergent lineages often coexist within populations of the annual legume Amphicarpaea braeteata. At one site dominated by two such lineages (termed biotypes "C" and "S"), isolates of root-nodule bacteria (Bradyrhizobium sp.) were sampled from both hosts and analyzed by enzyme electrophoresis. Symbiont populations on the two plant biotypes were highly distinct. Out of 15 bacterial multilocus genotypes detected (among 51 isolates analyzed), only one was shared in common by the two plant biotypes. Cluster analysis revealed three bacterial lineages (designated I, II, and III), with lineage I found exclusively on biotype C plants, and the two other lineages almost completely restricted to biotype S hosts. Laboratory inoculation tests indicated that lineage I bacteria were strictly specialized on biotype C hosts, forming few or no nodules on plants of the other host biotype. Bacterial lineages II and III were capable of forming nodules on both kinds of plants, but nodule numbers were often significantly higher on biotype S hosts. The nonrandom association between plant and bacterial lineages at this site implies that genetic diversity of hosts is an important factor in the maintenance of polymorphism within the symbiont population.Key words.-Bacteria, Bradyrhizobium, coevolution, legumes, linkage disequilibrium, mutualism, nitrogen fixation, polymorphism, symbiosis.Received April 12, 1994. Accepted September 21, 1994 Although it is widely accepted that host-parasite interactions should generate genetic polymorphism (Haldane 1949;Clarke 1976;Hamilton 1982), the situation is much less clear in mutualistic interactions among species. In host-parasite interactions, parasite specialization on hosts with a particular defense mechanism can result in frequency-dependent disease impact on hosts, leading to stable or cyclic polymorphisms in both species (Lewis 1981;Seger 1988). Law (1985) argued that quite different evolutionary processes should occur in mutualisms. Selection on each species in a mutualism will favor adaptation to the most prevalent phenotype in the other species, because individuals adapted only to rare phenotypes will receive fewer mutualistic benefits given their smaller chance of encountering a suitable partner. As a result, Law suggested that the evolutionary trend toward genotypic specialization thought to typify host-parasite coevolution should generally be lacking in mutualisms. Because polymorphism due to frequency-dependent disease impact requires parasite specialization (Lewis 1981;Seger 1988; Parker 1992a), the absence of such specialization in mutualisms would also imply the absence of any inherent tendency toward genetic polymorphism.However, this argument ignores the fact that different mutualist partners may vary widely in the fitness benefits that they can provide, with the optimal partner unlikely to be identical for all conspecific individuals. Thus, selection in mutualisms may favor intrapopulation specialization, if mechanisms exist to exclude incompatible partners and...