2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic performance under intermittent and terminal drought screening in rainfed lowland rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, VT450-2 and TSN9 (G5) would be the preferred genotypes for rainfed lowland conditions in southern Lao PDR. These results are consistent with adaptation to rainfall deficit being desirable for yield stability, so selection for improved drought tolerance should be of benefit Xangsayasane et al, 2014), with the intent to combine yield potential and grain yield under drought (Atlin et al, 2006;Blum, 2009Blum, , 2011Venuprasad et al, 2008).…”
Section: Genotype Groups and Genotype Codessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, VT450-2 and TSN9 (G5) would be the preferred genotypes for rainfed lowland conditions in southern Lao PDR. These results are consistent with adaptation to rainfall deficit being desirable for yield stability, so selection for improved drought tolerance should be of benefit Xangsayasane et al, 2014), with the intent to combine yield potential and grain yield under drought (Atlin et al, 2006;Blum, 2009Blum, , 2011Venuprasad et al, 2008).…”
Section: Genotype Groups and Genotype Codessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, these changes may vary according to the timing the stress is applied [36]. Drought stress imposed in the terminal stage of rice cycle is the most detrimental to grain yield, while plants may recover when the stress is applied in the vegetative stage [37]. This study was carried out as a refinement of the research of Reis et al [4], who studied different irrigation systems in lowland rice in Brazil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wopereis et al (1996) derived a drying function beyond −100 kPa, but they converted volumetric water content to SWP based on soil water retention characteristic curves. Several other researchers have also related SWP derived from volumetric water content to physiological responses during stress (Turner et al, 1986;Lilley and Fukai, 1994b;Boonjung and Fukai, 1996;Wopereis et al, 1996;Yang et al, 2007;Chu et al, 2013;Xangsayasane et al, 2014). In this study, we estimated SWP using a combination of tensiometric measurements and the mechanistic water flow model given by the Richards equation to examine if the SWP attained just before irrigation is resumed (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%