2001
DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.24.e121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotyping by apyrase-mediated allele-specific extension

Abstract: This report describes a single-step extension approach suitable for high-throughput single-nucleotide polymorphism typing applications. The method relies on extension of paired allele-specific primers and we demonstrate that the reaction kinetics were slower for mismatched configurations compared with matched configurations. In our approach we employ apyrase, a nucleotide degrading enzyme, to allow accurate discrimination between matched and mismatched primer-template configurations. This apyrase-mediated alle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these are: switching strands for analysis; the incorporation of additional mismatches in the allele specific primer near the 3 0 end (ARMS) [Newton et al, 1989]; titration of critical PCR reaction components to near-limiting levels ; the use of truncated Taq DNA polymerase (Stoffel fragment) lacking 5 0 to 3 0 exonuclease activity [Lawyer et al, 1993]; enrichment of target template by PCR prior to adding allele-specific primer [Kaltenbock and Schneider, 1998]; the use of nucleotide analogs to facilitate base conversion at 3 0 mismatched sites [Day et al, 1999]; and the use of apyrase to degrade dNTPs when reaction kinetics are slow at mismatched 3 0 ends (AMASE) [Ahmadian et al, 2001]. Recently, SNP genotyping using bidirectional, real-time allele-specific PCR with SYBR s Green fluorescent melt curve analysis of amplified products was described [Waterfall and Cobb, 2002].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these are: switching strands for analysis; the incorporation of additional mismatches in the allele specific primer near the 3 0 end (ARMS) [Newton et al, 1989]; titration of critical PCR reaction components to near-limiting levels ; the use of truncated Taq DNA polymerase (Stoffel fragment) lacking 5 0 to 3 0 exonuclease activity [Lawyer et al, 1993]; enrichment of target template by PCR prior to adding allele-specific primer [Kaltenbock and Schneider, 1998]; the use of nucleotide analogs to facilitate base conversion at 3 0 mismatched sites [Day et al, 1999]; and the use of apyrase to degrade dNTPs when reaction kinetics are slow at mismatched 3 0 ends (AMASE) [Ahmadian et al, 2001]. Recently, SNP genotyping using bidirectional, real-time allele-specific PCR with SYBR s Green fluorescent melt curve analysis of amplified products was described [Waterfall and Cobb, 2002].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNP S01 is a transition G-A, which induces G-T and C-A mismatches. They belong to the difficult mismatches known to yield extension products with Taq DNA polymerase and hinder proper discrimination between genotypes (Day et al 1999;Ahmadian et al 2001). The genotype of the parents, determined from sequence data, is heterozygote (G/A) for parent 1 (P1) and homozygote (G/G) for parent 2 (P2).…”
Section: Pamsa Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this method is the detection of the amplification products on agarose gel. On the other hand, the single base-pair change at the 3′ primer end is often not sufficient to ensure reliable discrimination between the two SNP alleles (Ahmadian et al 2001), and two reactions are needed, one for each allele (Kim et al 2005). To overcome these disadvantages, some improvement was achieved with PCR amplification of multiple specific alleles (PAMSA), which involves the use of at least two allele-specific primers in the same reaction and allows the detection of all the SNP alleles present in a sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotypes are often determined by scoring technologies that first report the genotypes by one or more quantitative measurements 1,2 . Since the continuous measurements must be reduced to one of three genotypes (in this work, denoted by AA, AB, BB), some values may have ambiguous classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some technologies classify genotypes using a mixture of univariate 2,4 or bivariate normal distributions 1,5 . For example, the Perkin Elmer software SNPscorer 5 uses an ellipsoidal model that they label "Ellipsoidal model of equal dimensions at constant orientation".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%