2019
DOI: 10.1101/547638
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genuine cross-frequency coupling networks in human resting-state electrophysiological recordings

Abstract: AbstractPhase synchronization of neuronal oscillations in specific frequency bands coordinates anatomically distributed neuronal processing and communication. Typically, oscillations and synchronization take place concurrently in many distinct frequencies, which serve separate computational roles in cognitive functions. While within-frequency phase synchronization has been studied extensively, less is known about the mechanisms that govern neuronal processing distributed across… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(282 reference statements)
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the presented models assume homogenous circuit properties of the underlying model. Conversely, it has recently been shown that relaxing those parameters (such as allowing for recurrent connection strength and excitatory subcortical input to differ across cortical regions) can improve the fit to empirical fMRI (Wang et al, 2019). While-as discussed abovethe global view puts forward a common spatial organization across all timescales, the relaxed parameters proposed by Wang et al implicate the possibility that individual regions oscillate at different frequencies.…”
Section: Phase Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presented models assume homogenous circuit properties of the underlying model. Conversely, it has recently been shown that relaxing those parameters (such as allowing for recurrent connection strength and excitatory subcortical input to differ across cortical regions) can improve the fit to empirical fMRI (Wang et al, 2019). While-as discussed abovethe global view puts forward a common spatial organization across all timescales, the relaxed parameters proposed by Wang et al implicate the possibility that individual regions oscillate at different frequencies.…”
Section: Phase Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach suggested in [37] refers to the use of multimodal recordings (e.g. LFP, inter area PAC in which the slow and fast rhythms are generated in distinct oscillators reduce concerns on spurious coupling [37,39]. In this regard, it has been noted that one-to-one mapping between electrode measurement (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they identified a flaw in the surrogate testing applied by Belluscio et al (). Recently, SiebenhĂŒhner et al () reported spontaneous cross‐frequency PPC within prefrontal, visual and sensorimotor cortices. The analysis was based on stereo‐electroencephalography and source‐reconstructed magnetoencephalography data and calculations were adjusted for the influence of non‐sinusoidal waveforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%