2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10651-010-0158-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoadditive regression modeling of stream biological condition

Abstract: Indices of biotic integrity have become an established tool to quantify the condition of small non-tidal streams and their watersheds. To investigate the effects of watershed characteristics on stream biological condition, we present a new technique for regressing IBIs on watershed-specific explanatory variables. Since IBIs are typically evaluated on an ordinal scale, our method is based on the proportional odds model for ordinal outcomes. To avoid overfitting, we do not use classical maximum likelihood estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exceptions are Ridgeway (2002) and Sexton and Laake (2012), who study boosting algorithms for fitting density functions. Lu and Li (2008), Schmid and Hothorn (2008) and Schmid, Hothorn, Maloney, Weller, and Potapov (2011) proposed boosting algorithms for transformation models that treat the transformation function h Y as a nuisance parameter. In the same model framework, Tutz and Groll (2013) propose a likelihood-boosting approach for fitting cumulative and sequential models for ordinal responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions are Ridgeway (2002) and Sexton and Laake (2012), who study boosting algorithms for fitting density functions. Lu and Li (2008), Schmid and Hothorn (2008) and Schmid, Hothorn, Maloney, Weller, and Potapov (2011) proposed boosting algorithms for transformation models that treat the transformation function h Y as a nuisance parameter. In the same model framework, Tutz and Groll (2013) propose a likelihood-boosting approach for fitting cumulative and sequential models for ordinal responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the residual information is computed with the component-wise gradient boosting algorithm of Bühlmann and Hothorn (2007), using the negative gradient vector of the loss-function from the current model. For ordinal response variables such as lvp, the loss-function is defined by the log-likelihood of the proportional odds model of Agresti (2003;Schmid et al 2011). After the fitting of the new tree, its paths are aggregated to the paths of the previously grown ones, albeit with a shrinkage parameter to grow the model slowly, which improves the fit relative to single trees (James et al 2014).…”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These functions depend on the coordinates of the site locations and are added to the other functions specified in (5) and (6) (cf. [15], [24]). To estimate the shapes of the surface functions, we use P-spline tensor product surfaces depending on the NAD83 coordinates of the lakes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many applications, predictor-response relationships are nonlinear in nature [15], [16]. This means that the linear predictor of the classical beta regression model needs to be replaced by a more flexible function that allows for an appropriate quantification of nonlinear predictor effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation