2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0440-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical behavior of heavy metals in a Zn–Pb–Cu mining area in the State of Mexico (central Mexico)

Abstract: The geochemical behavior of zinc, lead and copper from sulfidic tailings in a mine site with potential to generate acidic drainage (pyrite (55%) and sphalerite (2%)) is reported in this paper. The mining area is divided in two zones, considering the topographic location of sampling points with respect to the tailings pile: (a) outer zone, out of the probable influence of acid mine drainage (AMD) pollution, and (b) inner zone, probably influenced by AMD pollution. Maximum total ions concentrations (mg/L) measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of acid mine drainage on water results in impaired quality in the central Mexico was as a result of acid leachate in the abandoned mines, high concentrations of Cd, As, Pb, and Mn exceeding the permissible limit for human consumption [79].…”
Section: Water Quality Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of acid mine drainage on water results in impaired quality in the central Mexico was as a result of acid leachate in the abandoned mines, high concentrations of Cd, As, Pb, and Mn exceeding the permissible limit for human consumption [79].…”
Section: Water Quality Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of the most of the metals analyzed also exceed WHO limits, European commission and the United States environmental protection agency (USEPA) [132][133][134]. The metal concentrations in Malaysian ex-mining ponds [49,53,83] were found to be higher than that reported in Indonesia, Mexico, and Nigeria [79,87,88]. However, the concentrations of metals in the lake waters under review were lower than that obtained in Malaysia, Ethiopia, and India [77,94,97].…”
Section: General Water Quality Guideline and Legal Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contamination of the environment by arsenic from both anthropogenic and natural sources has occurred in many parts of the World and is now recognized as a global problem [5,6]. The principal anthropogenic sources for soil contamination by As include base metal smelters [715] and the mining of arsenic [8,1618], lead and zinc [7,10,11,15,19–21], gold [18,22,23] and other types of mines [2430]. Power plants that burn As-rich coals or treated lumber, disposal sites for wastes from As-processing plants, and industrial and municipal dump sites also represent sources of arsenic contamination in soil [1,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, soil is not only a passive acceptor of heavy metals, polluted soils become a source of contamination for other environmental components and the food chain (Gholizadeh et al 2015). In addition, heavy metals are non-degradable and persistent, their presence in soil is stable and doi: 10.17221/107/2016-SWR long-term (Lizárraga-Mendiola et al 2009). It has been found that the presence of heavy metals in the soil environment significantly influences biological, chemical, and physical soil properties, which results in decreased soil fertility and also ultimately crop contamination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%