2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(01)00855-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry of diffuse low-temperature hydrothermal fluids in the North Fiji basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Secular facies variation of exhalites associated with deepwater, Cu-rich VMS deposits is from Slack and Cannon (2009). stratigraphic level of the Cu-rich VMS deposit to ensure that they formed from the same hydrothermal system and not as separate systems that existed during periods of different water depths. Third, exhalites must be laterally extensive for >100 m along strike, in order to reflect precipitation from hydrothermal fluids that mixed with bottom waters near a vent or in a hydrothermal plume, as in modern VMS systems (German and Von Damm, 2004); smaller occurrences of isolated exhalites that lack stratigraphic continuity were probably deposited from diffuse, low-temperature (<50°C) fluids (Hein et al, 1999;Koschinsky et al, 2002) that may not record the redox state of coeval deep seawater. Fourth, it is important to exclude from consideration magnetite-rich lenses that formed by subsea-floor replacement and not as true exhalites, such as in the Gossan Hill VMS deposit in Western Australia (Sharpe and Gemmell, 2002), possibly as a result of nonredox transformations by hydrothermal fluids beneath the sea floor (Ohmoto, 2003) or by phase separation into vapor and brine in hydrothermal system (cf.…”
Section: Secular Patterns In Precambrian Vms-related Exhalitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secular facies variation of exhalites associated with deepwater, Cu-rich VMS deposits is from Slack and Cannon (2009). stratigraphic level of the Cu-rich VMS deposit to ensure that they formed from the same hydrothermal system and not as separate systems that existed during periods of different water depths. Third, exhalites must be laterally extensive for >100 m along strike, in order to reflect precipitation from hydrothermal fluids that mixed with bottom waters near a vent or in a hydrothermal plume, as in modern VMS systems (German and Von Damm, 2004); smaller occurrences of isolated exhalites that lack stratigraphic continuity were probably deposited from diffuse, low-temperature (<50°C) fluids (Hein et al, 1999;Koschinsky et al, 2002) that may not record the redox state of coeval deep seawater. Fourth, it is important to exclude from consideration magnetite-rich lenses that formed by subsea-floor replacement and not as true exhalites, such as in the Gossan Hill VMS deposit in Western Australia (Sharpe and Gemmell, 2002), possibly as a result of nonredox transformations by hydrothermal fluids beneath the sea floor (Ohmoto, 2003) or by phase separation into vapor and brine in hydrothermal system (cf.…”
Section: Secular Patterns In Precambrian Vms-related Exhalitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the LHF, the hydrothermal sulfide deposit is associated with ultramafic rocks located in a debris flow consisting of heterogeneous ultramafic and mafic intrusive rocks, including serpentinized harzburgite, serpentinized dunite, gabbronorite, and olivine-bearing basalt (e.g., Petersen et al, 2009;Zeng et al, 2014Zeng et al, , 2015a. In addition, in the North Fiji Basin, the S99HF is located immediately south of the triple junction point at 16°50´S and is hosted by basaltic rocks, the trace element composition of which indicates that magma generation was influenced by two different sources: normal mid-ocean ridge basalt (N-MORB) and ocean island basalt (OIB)-related to enriched mid-ocean ridge basalt (E-MORB) Nohara et al, 1994;Koschinsky et al, 2002;Kim et al, 2006). Figure 1 show the sampling location, depth, and mineralogy of the hydrothermal sulfide samples.…”
Section: Geological Setting and Sample Mineralogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it can be seen in Table 2, the presence of all the metals as contaminants in dialysis concentrate samples represents a serious contamination source for hemodialysis patients. Furthermore, the hydrothermal fluid samples have all the metals at concentrations higher than in normal seawater, due to the wellknown metal enrichment that occurs in these fluids [34]. The recovery values between 93.90 and 106.50% in dialysis concentrates, between 92.62 and 108.91% in seawater and between 93.51 and 98.76% in hydrothermal fluids prove the satisfactory accuracy and applicability of the proposed method for the simultaneous ASV determination of the metals in these saline samples.…”
Section: Analytical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%