2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-018-1661-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochronology, petrogenesis, and tectonic implications of Permian felsic rocks of the Central Great Xing’an Range, NE China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The late Carboniferous was marked by frequent large‐scale magmatic events, ranging from felsic to mafic in composition, in the study area, adjacent regions, and much of the Great Xing'an Range (Liu et al, 2017, 2019; Ma et al, , 2019; Wang et al, 2013). This magmatic activity lasted until the end of the Permian (Ma et al, b) and was spatially and temporally variable, being particularly strong, for example, during the early Permian in the central Great Xing'an Range (Ma et al, b). However, the sedimentary record in Jalaid Banner and adjacent areas of the western SXB from the Late Devonian to early Carboniferous is poorly known, and further research is needed to establish a more detailed and accurate record.…”
Section: Geological Background Samples and Petrographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The late Carboniferous was marked by frequent large‐scale magmatic events, ranging from felsic to mafic in composition, in the study area, adjacent regions, and much of the Great Xing'an Range (Liu et al, 2017, 2019; Ma et al, , 2019; Wang et al, 2013). This magmatic activity lasted until the end of the Permian (Ma et al, b) and was spatially and temporally variable, being particularly strong, for example, during the early Permian in the central Great Xing'an Range (Ma et al, b). However, the sedimentary record in Jalaid Banner and adjacent areas of the western SXB from the Late Devonian to early Carboniferous is poorly known, and further research is needed to establish a more detailed and accurate record.…”
Section: Geological Background Samples and Petrographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the zircon U-Pb age represents the emplacement age of rocks. In the sample PM104, one of the zircon U-Pb ages is 280 ± 3 Ma, considering the late Permian tectono-magmatic event in the adjacent area, such as the Zhalantun area [71], the Nenjiang area [72], and the Heihe area [72,73]. Therefore, the 280 ± 3 Ma zircon should be the captured zircon; we deleted the data for this point accordingly.…”
Section: Emplacement Ages Of Granitoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be divided into the Onder Sum–Kedanshan (Xan Moron) ophiolite belt, the Soloker–Linxi ophiolite belt, the Jiaoqier–Xilinhot ophiolite belt, and the Erenhot–Hegenshan ophiolite belt from south to north (Li, Wang, Li, & Dong, ; Miao et al, ). The Erenhot–Hegenshan ophiolite belt was once considered to represent the final suture location of the two cratons; however, the latest studies are believed to support the new perspective that the Soloker suture zone was probably the final convergence and collision zone between the two cratons (Chen et al, ; Chen, Jahn, Wilde, & Xu, ; Jian et al, ; Liu, Li et al, ; Luo et al, ; Ma et al, ; Miao et al, ; Xiao et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%