2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoelectrical methods for monitoring geological CO2 storage: First results from cross-hole and surface–downhole measurements from the CO2SINK test site at Ketzin (Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, geoelectrical measurements are applied together with laboratory investigations under simulated in situ conditions for calibration (Kiessling et al, 2010). The measurements are carried out using 15 circular electrodes distributed along the casing in each well as part of the smart casing installation together with fibre-optic cables.…”
Section: Monitoring Co 2 Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, geoelectrical measurements are applied together with laboratory investigations under simulated in situ conditions for calibration (Kiessling et al, 2010). The measurements are carried out using 15 circular electrodes distributed along the casing in each well as part of the smart casing installation together with fibre-optic cables.…”
Section: Monitoring Co 2 Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precise evaluation can be performed from numerical simulations of CO 2 injection where at least, permeability, capillary pressure and water relative permeability must be known. Furthermore, in the present context, resistivity data acquired are closely related to the new in situ monitoring technology (VERA system), which has been developed and tested in other research programs (Kiessling et al, 2010;Bergmann et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three layer baseline model is interpreted from an induction log, performed under baseline conditions, as illustrated in Figure 10a. The dashed lines mark the averaged layer resistivities following the interpretations of Kiessling et al (2010). In addition to the baseline model (t 0 ), two consecutive timesteps t 1 and t 2 are considered.…”
Section: Tomographic Inversion Performancementioning
confidence: 99%