2013
DOI: 10.1017/jlg.2013.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic information systems and perceptual dialectology: a method for processing draw-a-map data

Abstract: argue for the use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in order to aggregate, process and display PD data.Using case studies from the UK and Germany, we present examples of data processed using GIS, and illustrate the future possibilities for the use of GIS in PD research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first methodological modification we introduced to the "draw-a-map" task is to use a map which shows more detail than is customary in PD studies of, for example, the US (Evans, 2013;Niedzielski & Preston, 2003), or the UK and Germany (Montgomery & Stoeckle, 2013). The motivation behind this decision is twofold.…”
Section: Perceptual Dialectologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first methodological modification we introduced to the "draw-a-map" task is to use a map which shows more detail than is customary in PD studies of, for example, the US (Evans, 2013;Niedzielski & Preston, 2003), or the UK and Germany (Montgomery & Stoeckle, 2013). The motivation behind this decision is twofold.…”
Section: Perceptual Dialectologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital spatial representations of Kurdish people's mental maps of the varieties of their language and where they are spoken can furthermore be compared with maps produced through traditional dialectological methods (Hassanpour, 1992;Izady, 1992;. This can not only yield useful comparisons and challenge assumptions made in both research traditions (Butters, 1991), but also encourage traditional and perceptual dialectologists to look afresh at their results (Montgomery & Stoeckle, 2013). With these wide potential applications, the paper addresses the following research questions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During such tasks, respondents are asked to undertake further activities in which they add labels to dialect areas, as well as providing additional attitudinal information about the areas they have drawn. Maps from large numbers of respondents are sought, in order that the data they have added to maps can be aggregated (Preston and Howe 1987;Montgomery and Stoeckle, 2013) and generalised perceptions of the linguistic landscape investigated. Figure 2 shows the location of the respondents who participated in the draw-amap task, along with other geographical entities mentioned in this chapter.…”
Section: The Data and Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assist the respondents, a location map which contained a number of major cities and towns was projected for respondents for the first five minutes of the task. After the draw-a-map task had been completed, the data were processed by the Geographical Information Systems package (ArcGIS), following methods outlined in Montgomery and Stoeckle (2013). I have discussed the results of this research in relation to the perception of dialect areas elsewhere (Montgomery 2007;Montgomery 2008;Montgomery and Beal 2011;Montgomery 2011;Montgomery 2012a;Montgomery 2012b), and will only focus on the perception of the NorthSouth divide here.…”
Section: ) What Do You Think Of the Areas You've Just Drawn? How Migmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las investigaciones más recientes sobre dialectología perceptual se han realizado en países desarrollados, como en Estados Unidos (Fridland & Bartlett, 2006;Bucholtz, Bermudez, Fung, Vargas & Edwards, 2008;Preston, 2011Preston, , 2013Evans, 2013); Francia (Kuiper, 2005;Boughton, 2006); Noruega (Røsstad, 2009;Strand, 2012); Austria (Pfrehm, 2010); Alemania (Gessinger, 2010) y el Reino Unido (Hiraga, 2005;Montgomery, 2012;Montgomery & Stoeckle, 2013), principalmente. Las lenguas más estudiadas, por tanto, son el inglés, el francés, el noruego y el alemán.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified