Geographic Information Technologies for cultural research: cultural mapping and the prospects of colliding epistemologies

Abstract

This article discusses potential applications of Geographic Information Technologies in cultural research -amidst concern that confusion surrounds what these technologies are, and how they might be used. We discuss the adoption of Geographic Information Technologies in our own cultural research projects, motivated by empirical shortcomings with existing creative industries and cultural planning research methods, coupled with a desire to more fully explore the geography of cultural life within Australian cities. Geographic Information Technologies can comprise a range of technologies (proprietary GIS software systems, GPS, web mapping) that seek to accumulate geographical information for analysis within computer database systems. In our projects, Geographic Information Technologies enabled spatially sensitive questions about creative activity, affective links to city environments and cultural vitality (asked in interviews and focus groups) to be linked to central map databases. "Collisions of epistemologies" (Brown & Knopp, 2008) were made possible, dissolving boundaries between qualitative and quantitative methods, and connecting our philosophical commitment to everyday, vernacular forms of culture to matters of cultural planning. Results showed a refreshing amount of creative activity occurring beyond visible "hubs", in suburbs and the vernacular spaces of everyday life. Moreover, cultural life -and creative activities more specifically -was layered, localized and multifaceted within cities, in ways that preclude singular generalizations. Geographic Information Technologies and maps -with their capacities to capture complexity and layered phenomena -helped communicate such findings in digestible formats, to a range of community and government audiences.

Methodological Triangulation In Movement Pattern Research

“…Undoubtedly, qualitative social research enriches studies carried out in a space-time perspective with motives of actions taken (Goss, Leinbach 1996;Gibson et al 2010). This is right also in the opinion of the present authors, which they voiced in earlier paragraphs.…”

“…The triangulation of methods that interests us in this paper assumes the use of more than two research methods, as different as possible and offering tools to examine phenomena in a variety of relations (Jick 1979). This seems to be a key assumption in studies of movement patterns by GIS tracking if research of this type is to develop and lead to an explanation of human spatial behaviour (Ricketts et al 2008;Gibson et al 2010).…”

Less talk more drone: social research with UAVs

“…Interest in UAVs as social research tools issue fits into wider debates about the use of Geographic Information Technologies (GPS, Web 2.0 mapping, proprietary GIS software) in cultural and social research that involves collecting data on people in public (Gibson, Brennan-Horley, & Warren, 2010). In research at the Australian Centre for Social and Cultural Research (AUSCCER), there are a number of teaching areas that would benefit T. Birtchnell and C. Gibson from this technology in human geography methods and these were fielded after the demonstration.…”

Barapa Country through Barapa eyes: cultural mapping of Gunbower Island, Australia

“…That guidance from Barapa Elders and community has been essential in the development process. Identifying what to show and what to remove is an essential part of cultural mapping and collaboration (Chapin et al, 2005;Gibson, Brennan-Horley, & Warren, 2010;Watson et al, 2013).…”