2011
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xxxviii-4-c21-103-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic Objects: Theory or Technology Driven?

Abstract: ABSTRACT:This article aims to compare the geo-graphic (spatial) objects in 2D (planar objects) proposed by CON.G.O.O. and ISO standards, and the ability of a number of GIS software to handle them. The results achieved so far showed that the actual technical possibilities are not always sufficient to support the complex spatial objects proposed by CON.G.O.O.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pantazis [42][43][44]. The feasibility analysis behind SmaCiSENS involves significant works on the spatial 265 data analysis algorithms [36][37][38] which benefit from the semantic logic being robust and research…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pantazis [42][43][44]. The feasibility analysis behind SmaCiSENS involves significant works on the spatial 265 data analysis algorithms [36][37][38] which benefit from the semantic logic being robust and research…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%