“…It is particularly challenging to determine population boundaries for cetaceans due to their wide-ranging and largely pelagic distributions, but stable bioacoustic signal differences may be a useful line of evidence for determining population structure when combined with or supported by evidence of genetic, morphological, or distributional density differences (Martien et al, 2015). Population-specific differences in bioacoustic signals have been hypothesized for many mysticetes (e.g., Winn et al, 1981;McDonald et al, 2006;Delarue et al, 2009;Castellote et al, 2012) and some odontocetes (e.g., Rendell et al, 2012;Barkley et al, 2014;Samarra et al, 2015), and in some cases, these hypotheses are supported by genetic, morphometric, or distributional lines of evidence (Branch et al, 2007a;Branch et al, 2007b;Torres-Florez et al, 2014). As anthropogenic threats, such as pollution and fisheries interactions, increasingly impact the oceans and the cetaceans that inhabit them, it is necessary to have a solid baseline understanding of population structure to guide management decisions.…”