Purpose
To systematically examine trends and applications of the disease risk score (DRS) as a
confounder summary method.
Methods
We completed a systematic search of MEDLINE and Web of Science® to identify all
English language articles that applied DRS methods. We tabulated the number of publications by year
and type (empirical application, methodological contribution, or review paper) and summarized
methods used in empirical applications overall and by publication year (<2000,
≥2000).
Results
Of 714 unique articles identified, 97 examined DRS methods and 86 were empirical
applications. We observed a bimodal distribution in the number of publications over time, with a
peak 1979-1980, and resurgence since 2000. The majority of applications with methodological detail
derived DRS using logistic regression (47%), used DRS as a categorical variable in regression (93%),
and applied DRS in a non-experimental cohort (47%) or case-control (42%) study. Few studies examined
effect modification by outcome risk (23%).
Conclusion
Use of DRS methods has increased yet remains low. Comparative effectiveness research may
benefit from more DRS applications, particularly to examine effect modification by outcome risk.
Standardized terminology may facilitate identification, application, and comprehension of DRS
methods. More research is needed to support the application of DRS methods, particularly in
case-control studies.