Geography and social distribution of malaria in Indonesian Papua: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundDespite being one of the world’s most affected regions, only little is known about the social and spatial distributions of malaria in Indonesian Papua. Existing studies tend to be descriptive in nature; their inferences are prone to confounding and selection biases. At the same time, there remains limited malaria-cartographic activity in the region. Analysing a subset (N = 22,643) of the National Basic Health Research 2007 dataset (N = 987,205), this paper aims to quantify the district-specific risk of malaria in Papua and to understand how socio-demographic/economic factors measured at individual and district levels are associated with individual’s probability of contracting the disease.MethodsWe adopt a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model that accommodates not only the nesting of individuals within the island’s 27 administrative units but also the spatial autocorrelation among these locations. Both individual and contextual characteristics are included as predictors in the model; a normal conditional autoregressive prior and an exchangeable one are assigned to the random effects. Robustness is then assessed through sensitivity analyses using alternative hyperpriors.ResultsWe find that rural Papuans as well as those who live in poor, densely forested, lowland districts are at a higher risk of infection than their counterparts. We also find age and gender differentials in malaria prevalence, if only to a small degree. Nine districts are estimated to have higher-than-expected malaria risks; the extent of spatial variation on the island remains notable even after accounting for socio-demographic/economic risk factors.ConclusionsAlthough we show that malaria is geography-dependent in Indonesian Papua, it is also a disease of poverty. This means that malaria eradication requires not only biological (proximal) interventions but also social (distal) ones.

Does livestock protect from malaria or facilitate malaria prevalence? A cross-sectional study in endemic rural areas of Indonesia

“…A gradient of malaria prevalence from rural (58.9%) to urban areas (33.9%) has been known in the Bata district of Equatorial Guinea (EG) [ 24 ]. This situation is consistent with the identified high-risk in the rural context that was found in West Papua, Papua [ 23 ] and East Nusa Tenggara [ 6 , 25 ]. A similar variation of spatial malaria distribution was observed in a cross-sectional study in rural areas in Haiti (4–41%), and demographic data indicated some focal disease transmission [ 26 ].…”

“…Spatial variation in malaria prevalence has to be taken into account in Indonesia [ 23 ]. The highest malaria prevalence was found in South Sorong, a known malaria endemic province [ 6 ].…”

Spatial modelling of malaria cases associated with environmental factors in South Sumatra, Indonesia

“…Globally, Anopheline species diversity and density decline from the lowlands to highlands [ 40 ]. Accordingly, poor villagers living in forested lowland areas in Papua, Indonesia, were found to be at higher risk of malaria infection than those in the highlands [ 41 ]. In contrast, a positive correlation between altitude and the abundance of Anopheles mosquitoes has observed in the highlands of Ethiopia, Colombia and Ecuador, particularly in warmer years [ 42 – 44 ].…”

Plasmodium falciparum Serine Repeat Antigen 5 (PfSERA5): current vaccine candidate for Plasmodium falciparum malaria

“…This high prevalence of cases and mortality rates make malaria an infectious disease that should be watched out globally so that every country has a commission to eliminate this infectious disease. 3 Vector control is an essential component in preventing malaria. Such control is successful in reducing or disrupting malaria transmission when coverage is high.…”