“…Third, despite the continuous restructuring of Anglophone Geography departments, we must also pay attention to the uneven and varied development of Geography in different social contexts. In a recent themed intervention in the Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , geographers based in Australia, China, Sri Lanka, South Africa and the Philippines reported the state of Geography in these countries (see Head and Rutherfurd, 2021; Hennayake, 2021; Qian and Zhang, 2021; Saguin et al, 2021). Specifically, in Australia, Geography has been affected by precarious and recurrent departmental restructuring; in China, geographers yet share varied focuses from Anglophone academia, in terms of theoretical and methodological paradigms as for practical application and/or critical and reflexive knowledge production and transmission; in the Philippines, the development of Geography turned to be constrained in the country’s higher education system; in Sri Lanka, however, Geography’s sub-disciplinary fragmentation and the significance of Anglophone Geography are outstanding, flagging a ‘decolonial praxis’ to refocus on the country’s own geography – as well as on Africa’s too.…”