“…This is supported by: (1) a lack of oversteepened elemental profiles that would indicate significant, late uptake ( Figure 4 ); (2) the absence of signs of trace element leaching (i.e., most elemental concentrations increase rather than decrease toward the cortical margin; Figure 4 ), and; (3) an REE composition most similar in appearance to circum-neutral pH (cf., [ 89 ]) rivers and lake freshwaters rather than alkali groundwaters ( Figure 7 A), which is inconsistent with the incorporation of a major portion of the trace element inventory of the bone from late diagenetic fluids. Overall, the bone exhibits high surface concentrations of LREE (average ~2300 ppm; Data S1), yet its ∑REE value of 1964 ppm is comparable to that of most other Mesozoic bones reported in the prior literature ( Table 3 ), which exhibit ∑REE ranging from ~300 ppm to over 25,000 ppm [ 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ], as are its concentrations of Y (505 ppm), Lu (4 ppm), and U (19 ppm). In contrast, Fe (0.19 wt%), Sr (1747 ppm), and Ba (447 ppm) each exhibit low average concentrations compared to other protein-bearing dinosaur bones we have recently analyzed (0.73–1.76 wt%, ~2300–3700 ppm, and ~900–2100 ppm, respectively) [ 49 , 100 ], perhaps reflecting low abundance of these elements within early diagenetic pore fluids at this site.…”