Geometria Espacial nas questões do Enem

Oliveira, Wellington Fabiano Santos de; Cristovão, Eliane Matesco

doi:10.37001/emr.v27i74.2731

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their mapping sought studies that used the Problem-Solving methodology to teach and learn Geometry in K-12 education. Oliveira & Cristovão (2022) work analyzes the Spatial Geometry questions on the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM-National High School Exam). Souza's (2016) dissertation presents an experience with Problem-Solving for learning and teaching Geometry supported by support material composed of touchable geometric solids with senior students in a public high school in Campina Grande (state of Paraíba).…”

Section: Lack Of Updated Bibliography To Teach Geometry In Higher Edu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Geometry in Mathematics Teaching in Undergraduate Courses at Brazilian Federal Universities

Moreira¹,

Pinto²

2023

Acta Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Geometry has been an essential point of reflection in Mathematics Education, especially in teaching. Objective: We conducted a numerical calculation to quantify the study load of Euclidean geometry concerning the total course load. From this data, we established different pathways to explore the Geometry subjects of these courses and their approaches. We aimed to outline an understanding of Geometry teaching in Mathematics teaching courses in the selected universities. Design: We consulted the CPPs through the official websites of the universities. We catalogued the total study load, the subjects of Geometry, and a comparison of the Geometry subjects and their occurrence. Finally, we analysed the syllabuses and bibliography of one subject listed. Context and participants: We surveyed 68 Brazilian Federal Universities, all institutions that offer the Mathematics Teaching course. Data collection and analysis: We treated the data through qualitative analysis and presented them in a large table subdivided into smaller tables to present the data. Results: After analysing the tabulated data, its result corroborated the research of Crescenti (2005), Lorenzato (1995), Lovis (2009, 2013), Pavanello (1989, 1993), Perez (1991, 2000), Serralheiro (2007) that Geometry is little taught in educational institutions, be them K-12 or higher education. Conclusions: We have identified a significant variation in each course's study load percentage dedicated to Geometry. Even among those that reached the highest values, it is still possible to question if those numbers are enough to solve the issues pointed out by K12 teachers. We have also identified divergencies in the approach suggested in the syllabuses and bibliographies of the subject Plane Geometry. Such numerical and approach deviations need to be deepened by other works.

show abstract

Section: Lack Of Updated Bibliography To Teach Geometry In Higher Edu...mentioning

confidence: 99%