2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric and design parameters of fins employed for enhancing thermal energy storage systems: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work agrees with earlier work [17,32,[93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101] in concluding that fins are an effective strategy for the enhancement of heat transfer within LHTSDs. However, it qualifies that conclusion by noting that the flow and melt boundary develop in similar ways in both cases despite the significant differences in geometry.…”
Section: Analysis Of Melt and Flow Behavior During Dischargingsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work agrees with earlier work [17,32,[93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101] in concluding that fins are an effective strategy for the enhancement of heat transfer within LHTSDs. However, it qualifies that conclusion by noting that the flow and melt boundary develop in similar ways in both cases despite the significant differences in geometry.…”
Section: Analysis Of Melt and Flow Behavior During Dischargingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The latter approach includes the encapsulation of the PCM in a protective polymer coating [28,89,90] and the use of heat pipes to carry thermal energy between a heat transfer fluid and the PCM [91,92]. However, the most common (and cost-effective) strategy to enhance heat transfer into and out of a PCM thermal storage unit is the use of high conductivity fins [17,32,93]. Previous computational and experimental work on finned heat spreaders demonstrates that they consistently enhance heat transfer within a variety of types of LHTSDs [94], including containers with flat plate fins [95,96], axial fins [97,98], and circular fins [99][100][101].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common types of fins are longitudinal/rectangular, 186 circular/annular, 187 and plate fins. 192 In addition, fins should be made of highly conductive metals to ensure good heat transfer. Agyenim et al 189 compared the thermal performance of horizontal concentric tube storage devices with three different structures (finless, circular fins, and longitudinal fins).…”
Section: Adding Fins On the Container Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…191 Increasing fin thickness and width or decreasing fin spacing significantly shortens the phase transition time. 192 In addition, fins should be made of highly conductive metals to ensure good heat transfer.…”
Section: Adding Fins On the Container Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the characteristics of simple fabrication, low cost construction, and large heat transfer surfaces, fins are used in a majority of PCM-based LHTES systems. There are several different configurations of fins such as longitudinal, annular, circular, plates, pins, tree shape, and other novel geometries as shown in Figure 1 [4]. By applying extended internal fins, the average thermal conductivity and heat transfer depth of LHTES system are improved, so that the melting and solidification rate of PCMs are accelerated.…”
Section: Introduction To Heat Transfer Enhancement Techniques Of Pcmsmentioning
confidence: 99%