2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2013.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric interpretation of the residual dependence coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the gauge function of (X 1 , X 2 ) is obtained as ν when − log F R ∈ RV ∞ δ , using Proposition 3.1 therein. We found η X = ζ δ , with ζ = ν(1, 1) −1 , precisely as in Nolde (2014).…”
Section: Model Of Huser and Wadsworth (2018) They Consider Scale Mixtsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…the gauge function of (X 1 , X 2 ) is obtained as ν when − log F R ∈ RV ∞ δ , using Proposition 3.1 therein. We found η X = ζ δ , with ζ = ν(1, 1) −1 , precisely as in Nolde (2014).…”
Section: Model Of Huser and Wadsworth (2018) They Consider Scale Mixtsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…More refined results are obtained under the further assumption of Weibull-like tails. Section 3 discusses coefficients of tail dependence and extends Theorem 2.1 in [27] on the relationship between the coefficient of intermediate tail dependence and the geometry of the limit set S. Section 4 describes the asymptotic behaviour of the number of sample points in risk regions. The Concentration Lemma (Lemma 4.2) allows us to construct distributions with unexpected second-order expansions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In other words, (28) says that P(X i > γ, X j > γ) is regularly-varying with index 1/η. The index is called the residual tail index [15,31]. 5 When (X i , X j ) exhibit AD (AI) then we typically have η = 1 (η < 1).…”
Section: Residual Tail Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%