2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13592-011-0013-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric morphometrics of the wing as a tool for assigning genetic lineages and geographic origin to Melipona beecheii (Hymenoptera: Meliponini)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the double influence on wing morphology of life history traits and of the conditions at the location where the individual developed creates confounding effects and reduces the power of wing morphology to determine the geographical origin. Finally, morphological differences are also often associated with genetic structure (Villemant et al 2007, Francoy et al 2011, Vicente et al 2011, Neto et al 2013. However, previous studies found no evidence for genetic structure either in relation with geographical origin (Hondelmann et al 2005, Raymond et al 2013b, or with overwintering strategy (Raymond et al 2013a) in E. balteatus.…”
Section: Wing Morphology As a Tool For The Characterization Of Migratmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the double influence on wing morphology of life history traits and of the conditions at the location where the individual developed creates confounding effects and reduces the power of wing morphology to determine the geographical origin. Finally, morphological differences are also often associated with genetic structure (Villemant et al 2007, Francoy et al 2011, Vicente et al 2011, Neto et al 2013. However, previous studies found no evidence for genetic structure either in relation with geographical origin (Hondelmann et al 2005, Raymond et al 2013b, or with overwintering strategy (Raymond et al 2013a) in E. balteatus.…”
Section: Wing Morphology As a Tool For The Characterization Of Migratmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This method is based on the principle that local conditions can shape the development of animals (Bateson et al 2004), and that different environmental pressures can lead to morphological differences (Alibert et al 2001, Francoy et al 2011. Morphology could thus reveal the local conditions that prevailed during the development of the organism, and the geographical origin associated to these local conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dujardin et al 2003). Recently, geometric morphometric approaches have shown higher statistical power compared to traditional morphometrics for species separation (Bookstein 1991;Zelditch et al 2004;Francoy et al 2011;Zinetti et al 2013). By eliminating the effect of size, statistical comparison of landmarks used in geometric morphometrics can reveal differences of actual shapes or forms with greater power of discrimination (Mitteroecker and Gunz 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By eliminating the effect of size, statistical comparison of landmarks used in geometric morphometrics can reveal differences of actual shapes or forms with greater power of discrimination (Mitteroecker and Gunz 2009). In bees, geometric morphometrics of the forewing has been capable of discriminating operational taxonomic units (Aytekin et al 2007;Francoy et al 2008Francoy et al , 2011Kandemir et al 2011). Importantly, such identification seems to conform to those based on molecular markers (Francoy et al 2012;Oleksa and Tofilski 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%