2010
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767310039140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric properties of nucleic acids with potential for autobuilding

Abstract: Algorithms and geometrical properties are described for the automated building of nucleic acids in experimental electron density.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, another research group also independently determined that C1′ was superior to C4′ for this type of application (Gruene & Sheldrick, 2011; Keating & Pyle, 2010). Thus, for purposes of automated building of RNA into electron density, the P and C1′ atoms appear to be the optimal anchors for a virtual bond system.…”
Section: Pseudo-torsions As Reduced Representations For Rna Conformentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, another research group also independently determined that C1′ was superior to C4′ for this type of application (Gruene & Sheldrick, 2011; Keating & Pyle, 2010). Thus, for purposes of automated building of RNA into electron density, the P and C1′ atoms appear to be the optimal anchors for a virtual bond system.…”
Section: Pseudo-torsions As Reduced Representations For Rna Conformentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 a ). The η′ and θ′ torsions are more suitable when interpreting crystallographic density because the C1′ atom is covalently bound to the nucleoside base and therefore can be more easily and accurately located within a low-resolution map (Gruene & Sheldrick, 2011; Keating & Pyle, 2010). …”
Section: The η/θ Formalism As Platform For Innovation In Rna Strucmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A few methods have been also developed to facilitate manual model building, such as RCrane (Keating & Pyle, 2010) and Coot (Emsley et al, 2010) Nautilus and ARP/wARP need to determine both the phosphate and base or sugar ring positions to accurately assign the backbone conformers of a single-stranded polynucleotide fragment of a crystal structure model. However, the detection of bases is in general far more difficult than that of phosphates, in particular at low resolution (Hattne & Lamzin, 2008;Gruene & Sheldrick, 2011). In contrast, phenix.find_helices_ strands and phenix.build_rna_helices use a convolution search to find places in the asymmetric unit where an A-RNA or B-DNA helix can be placed (the latter program exclusively builds RNA models).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%