2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10338-022-00311-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrically Exact Finite Element Formulation for Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling continuum robots is a multifaceted and multi-dimensional challenge. From the perspective of handling the unit structural form, continuum robot modeling can be primarily categorized into several approaches: Cosserat rod theory [ 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 ] for micropolar bodies, piecewise constant curvature (PCC) models [ 23 ], arc segment models [ 93 ], geometrically finite element methods [ 94 ], and modal methods [ 95 , 96 ]. Micropolar and finite element approaches are more suited for describing complex nonlinear deformations in continuum robots.…”
Section: Continuum Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling continuum robots is a multifaceted and multi-dimensional challenge. From the perspective of handling the unit structural form, continuum robot modeling can be primarily categorized into several approaches: Cosserat rod theory [ 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 ] for micropolar bodies, piecewise constant curvature (PCC) models [ 23 ], arc segment models [ 93 ], geometrically finite element methods [ 94 ], and modal methods [ 95 , 96 ]. Micropolar and finite element approaches are more suited for describing complex nonlinear deformations in continuum robots.…”
Section: Continuum Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, a few analytical models have been developed for the kinematic modeling of tendondriven robots, such as the constant curvature model [39] and the geometrically exact beam theory [40]. The constant curvature model is the most adopted The initial configuration and the deformed configuration with the free body diagram of the SCR are shown in figures 3(a) and (b).…”
Section: Improved Constant Curvature Model Involving Axial Contractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The node values are then solved to satisfy the BCs following the relation between elements as defined by the PDEs. For complex geometries, the elements can be locally refined or relaxed to capture sensitive changes or expedite computations [92,93]. These models provide the most accurate predictions of dynamic soft materials but are also the most computationally expensive.…”
Section: Femmentioning
confidence: 99%