This article compiles an expose of Valentino Braitenberg's singular view on neuroanatomy and neuroscience. The review emphasizes his topologically informed work on neuroanatomy and his dialectics of brain-based explanations of motor behavior. Some of his early ideas on topologically informed neuroanatomy are presented, together with some of his more obscure work on the taxonomy of neural fiber bundles and synaptic arborizations. His functionally informed interpretations of neuroanatomy of the cerebellum, cortex, and hippocampus, are introduced. Finally, we will touch on his philosophical views and the inextricable role of function in the explanation of neural behavior.Keywords Neuroscience · Neuroanatomy · History · Braitenberg · Behavioral function
ProlegomenaAbove great achievements, what brings the community to admire a scientist is a set of characteristics that transcend science and knowledge and approach nobility and wisdom. Science is a human endeavor with the commendable goal of understanding reality, in the hope that advancing science will bring us to better understand ourselves, and ourselves in the world. Through the work of great men, we approach that ideal.In great minds, tenacity is augmented by the ability to channel the product of observations with clarity and flair. In their descriptions the reality beneath the experiment becomes alive, unencumbered by jargon, wants to speak itself. The constraints imposed by experiment rather than nuisances, appear as scaffolds. For them, nature both suggests and takes precedence over theoretical constructs. As a consequence, their prose often reads as if it would have written itself, as if truth yearned for light.This article was conceived before the passing of Valentino Braitenberg, in the hope that he would have the opportunity to personally review it. Due to that it will likely at times read as an eulogy, but in that case, I believe, excusably. Braitenberg was a model of scientific attitude, both sober and jovial, inspired and humble, strict, and flexible. Simultaneously able to capture the essentials in an effortless glance, while swiftly accepting the burden of proof. With clarity, he indicated the flimsy, the flaky, the incomplete, the obscure, the messy, the missing, meanwhile stressing the necessary, the inescapable, the solid. Sternly, he offered pondered and polished logical foundations of his beliefs.The article attempts to characterize Valentino's manner of doing neuroanatomy and neuroscience while enlisting some of his most significant contributions to theory, method, and philosophy of the functional interpretation of neuroanatomy.With the hope of becoming great, we attempt to mirror ourselves against models. In neuroscience we have great men to mirror ourselves against. Cajal, Sherrington, Varela, Bernstein, von Helmholz, Reichardt, and now Braitenberg. Valentino Braitenberg was a living influence on many, and his legacy will be there for many to discover and learn from.
123