2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/R 2016
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2016.8069606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry optimization of dual-layer offset detectors for compact ring diameter PET systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The offset scintillator layer method is another type of configuration to acquire DOI information (Liu et al 2001, Zhang et al 2002. It differs from conventional phoswich configuration, for instance, the DOI information no longer depends on the decay-time difference, but on the light distribution (Ito et al 2011, Teimoorisichani andGoertzen 2017). This is done by shifting the top layer in the x and/or y direction relative to the bottom layer, so that a unique light distribution would correspond to each location in the phoswich detector (Liu et al 2001, Zhang et al 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offset scintillator layer method is another type of configuration to acquire DOI information (Liu et al 2001, Zhang et al 2002. It differs from conventional phoswich configuration, for instance, the DOI information no longer depends on the decay-time difference, but on the light distribution (Ito et al 2011, Teimoorisichani andGoertzen 2017). This is done by shifting the top layer in the x and/or y direction relative to the bottom layer, so that a unique light distribution would correspond to each location in the phoswich detector (Liu et al 2001, Zhang et al 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal width was assumed to be about 3 mm such that the adjacent block detectors in each detector ring just touch. Also, the front/back layer thickness (d F /d B ) for each total thickness d T was chosen according to a separate optimization study Goertzen 2016, Teimoorisichani andGoertzen 2018). Table 1 summarizes the geometrical properties of the DLO detectors considered in this study.…”
Section: Scanner Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our previous work considered detectors of 10 to 30 mm thickness (Teimoorisichani and Goertzen 2016, in this work we considered detectors of 10, 15 and 20 mm thickness due to the limited bore diameter of the MR scanner and the sufficient estimated sensitivity achievable by a 20 mm thick detector. A total of 36 different detector areas between 0.04 (1 crystal per detector block) to 101.37 cm 2 (2500 crystals per detector block) were studied.…”
Section: Detector Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a significant interest in developing brain-dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) inserts and stand-alone scanners (Morimoto et al 2011, Yamamoto et al 2011, Kolb et al 2012, Mikhaylova et al 2014, Nishikido et al 2014, Jung et al 2015, 2016, Teimoorisichani and Goertzen 2016, Ahmed et al 2017. A braindedicated PET scanner requires a smaller bore diameter than a whole-body scanner which increases detection sensitivity while reducing the effects of photon acollinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%