2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00450-014-0283-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry simplification according to semantic constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BIM-originated geometry must, therefore, be simplified and reduced to be used for BEM, also contributing to shorter computational times in simulating complex models (Lagüela et al, 2014;Choi et al, 2016). The preparation or simplification can be performed automatically to some extent but also needs manual efforts (Ladenhauf et al, 2016;Pinheiro et al, 2018). Furthermore, insufficient construction or material information in BIM objects, not defined by the original BIM authoring side, poses another barrier for BIM-based BEM (Kim et al, 2016).…”
Section: Challenges In Bim-based Building Energy Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BIM-originated geometry must, therefore, be simplified and reduced to be used for BEM, also contributing to shorter computational times in simulating complex models (Lagüela et al, 2014;Choi et al, 2016). The preparation or simplification can be performed automatically to some extent but also needs manual efforts (Ladenhauf et al, 2016;Pinheiro et al, 2018). Furthermore, insufficient construction or material information in BIM objects, not defined by the original BIM authoring side, poses another barrier for BIM-based BEM (Kim et al, 2016).…”
Section: Challenges In Bim-based Building Energy Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topology relationships of indoor spaces are the basis for indoor spatial queries, and the establishment of explicit topology relationships can be helpful in constructing adjacencies of indoor spaces and generating indoor paths [44]. One approach that can be attempted to establish topological relationships for indoor spaces is to simplify building components, such as walls, by reducing the thickness to a thin surface [45] and representing two adjacent rooms that share the common surface. The simplified description of a building in the literature [45] can be summarized as follows: In the simplified model, the exterior boundary surface of a building is the outer contour of the building, while the interior boundary surface is located at the center of the interior wall, as shown in Figure 4a.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach that can be attempted to establish topological relationships for indoor spaces is to simplify building components, such as walls, by reducing the thickness to a thin surface [45] and representing two adjacent rooms that share the common surface. The simplified description of a building in the literature [45] can be summarized as follows: In the simplified model, the exterior boundary surface of a building is the outer contour of the building, while the interior boundary surface is located at the center of the interior wall, as shown in Figure 4a. However, this approach cannot be applied to buildings with irregular outer contours.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level of detail, for example, is accessory when the model is intended to describe whether two spaces are contiguous or whether there is a connection between them. For this reason, there are works aimed at simplifying the most popular standards [44][45][46][47] in order to obtain simpler models that are compliant with the standard. Of all the mentioned features, one of the most interesting is the multi-layered representation proposed by the IndoorGML standard.…”
Section: State-of-the-art For Space Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%