1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0952836999001090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophagy in the golden-faced saki monkey (Pithecia pithecia chrysocephala) in the Central Amazon

Abstract: The golden-faced saki monkey Pithecia pithecia chrysocephala (Cebidae, Primates) was observed eating soil from termite nests during a long-term study of a family group in a Central Amazonian forest fragment. In this paper we describe the behaviour involved in the geophagy in these monkeys, and the results of geochemical and physical analyses of the termite nest material, as well as root mat and topsoil samples below the trees, in order to clarify the possible reasons for it. The sakis ate soil from nine arbore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Callicebus spp. can be related to one of several benefits (or a combination of them) resulted from ingestion of soil, including mineral supplementation, antacid action, toxin absorption, endoparasite control, and/or antidiarrheal agents (Krishnamani and Mahaney 2000;Setz et al 1999). Forest ground levels have a higher concentration than the canopy of old and dead bark under which insects can hide (Li 2007), and may be locally rich in clay and mud areas (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Callicebus spp. can be related to one of several benefits (or a combination of them) resulted from ingestion of soil, including mineral supplementation, antacid action, toxin absorption, endoparasite control, and/or antidiarrheal agents (Krishnamani and Mahaney 2000;Setz et al 1999). Forest ground levels have a higher concentration than the canopy of old and dead bark under which insects can hide (Li 2007), and may be locally rich in clay and mud areas (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actuality, there is very little data on any of the taxa in the wild. Examples are: P. pithecia, which has been studied the longest with the most publications, but in particular by Norconk and associates 1 , and others (e.g., Mittermeier and Van Roosmalen, 1981;Oliveira et al, 1985;Vié et al, 2001;Riveros and Ferreira, 2001;Lehman et al, 2001;Janson, 2006, 2007); P. chrysocephala (see Rylands, 1992;Setz, 1993;Setz and Gaspar, 1997;Setz et al, 1999;Gilbert and Setz, 2001;Gilbert, 2003); P. napensis (called "aequatorialis" by DiFiore et al, 2007); P. aequatorialis (see Aquino et al, 2009); P. albicans (see Johns, 1985, Peres 1993; and a handful of other species (Heymann and Bartecki, 1990;Heymann et al, 2002;Frisoli, 2009; Palminteri and Peres 2012). Table 4.…”
Section: Conservation Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), and BDFFP has suffered from theft, i Six primate species reside in the BDFFP study area: red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus), black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus), brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella), brown bearded saki (Chiropotes satanas chiropotes) 1 , white-faced saki monkey (Pithecia pithecia), and goldenhanded tamarin (Saguinus midas). Although research at BDFFP has been ongoing since 1979, primate research in the forest fragments has been sporadic, with in-depth behavioral and ecological research only on red howler monkeys [35][36][37][38][39][40], white-faced saki monkeys [41][42][43], and bearded saki monkeys [44]. Therefore, there is still much to learn regarding the responses of the primates to forest fragmentation.…”
Section: Overview Of Conservation Issuementioning
confidence: 99%