2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-020-02432-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical Investigation of Mount Nemrut Stratovolcano (Bitlis, Eastern Turkey) Through Aeromagnetic Anomaly Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The global solution is always necessary to interpret any geophysical data [1,29,97]. Hence, the procedure developed by [98,99] is used for the present study.…”
Section: Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The global solution is always necessary to interpret any geophysical data [1,29,97]. Hence, the procedure developed by [98,99] is used for the present study.…”
Section: Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical exploration employing magnetic data helps study the subsurface properties by measuring the variation of the geomagnetic field primarily caused due to the presence of mineral bodies and different geological structures [1]. Such variation of magnetic field intensity formed due to contrast of magnetic susceptibility between the host rocks and the target mineralized bodies or the structures and can be used to limit the depth, location, orientation, geometry, and magnetic moment of the subsurface structure [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismogenic zone 6 covers the NW-SE striking Erzincan basin which appears to be a major step over along the NAFZ (Şengör, 1979;Hubert-Ferrari et al, 2002). The largest events in this seismogenic Okay and Tüysüz, 1999;Yiğitbaş et al, 2004;USGS, 2010;Ekinci et al, 2020Ekinci et al, , 2021Işık et al, 2020 We used instrumental (M S ≥ 5.5, until the end of 2019) and historical data with maximum intensities of I 0 ≥ 9.0 corresponding to surface wave magnitude M S ≥ 7.0 (Sayıl, 2013). Different-scaled magnitudes were transformed to M S using empirical equations obtained from regional earthquakes (Figure 3).…”
Section: Rtimap Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1. Tectonic map of Turkey and the surrounding (compiled withOkay and Tüysüz, 1999;Yiğitbaş et al, 2004; USGS, 2010;Ekinci et al, 2020Ekinci et al, , 2021Işık et al, 2020). NAFZ, North Anatolian Fault Zone; EAFZ, East Anatolian Fault Zone; NEAFZ, Northeast Anatolian Fault Zone; BZSZ, Bitlis-Zagros Suture Zone; DSFZ, Dead Sea Fault Zone; WAGS, West Anatolian Graben System; SBST, Southern Black Sea Thrust.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aeromagnetic exploration is generally used in geological research, mineral exploitation, and underground unexploded ordnance detection (Ekinci et al, 2020;Beamish and White, 2011;Doll et al, 2012). Since the magnetic field generated by the ferromagnetic material and metal-cutting geomagnetic wires on the aircraft platform will interfere with the magnetic detector, it will affect the quality of aeromagnetic survey data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%